[2015] KEHC 4194 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 4194 (KLR)

The court found that although the accused persons have a constitutional right to apply for bond, this right is not absolute and may be limited where there are compelling reasons. The court considered the affidavit evidence and the pre-bail assessment report, both of which indicated fears for the safety of the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEHC 4194 (KLR)
Parties
Respondent: Republic; Applicant: Abel Moseti Mogaka; Applicant: Peter Nyagaka Mogaka; Applicant: Elijah Momanyi Omwenga
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisii
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Case 99 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Bond Application
Outcome
application for bond dismissed
Legal Topics
Bail and Bond, Compelling Reasons, Murder Charge, Pre Bail Assessment, Constitutional Rights
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Bail and Bond Compelling Reasons Murder Charge Pre Bail Assessment Constitutional Rights

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Respondent

Abel Moseti Mogaka

Applicant

Peter Nyagaka Mogaka

Applicant

Elijah Momanyi Omwenga

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Case / Ruling on Bond Application

  1. 1 Whether the accused persons are entitled to be released on bond pending trial for murder.
  2. 2 Whether there are compelling reasons to deny the accused persons bond as provided under Article 49(1)(h) of the Constitution.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that although the accused persons have a constitutional right to apply for bond, this right is not absolute and may be limited where there are compelling reasons. The court considered the affidavit evidence and the pre-bail assessment report, both of which indicated fears for the safety of the victim's family due to alleged past threats by the accused. Given the relationship between the accused and the deceased, and the concerns raised, the court determined that releasing the accused on bond would not be in the interest of the victim's family. Therefore, the application for bond was denied, but the accused were granted liberty to renew the application in the future.

Court Disposition

application for bond dismissed

Orders

  • The application for bond by the three accused persons is denied.
  • The accused persons may renew the application.