[2006] KEHC 407 (KLR)
The court found that the accused unlawfully caused the death of the deceased by stabbing him with a knife during a quarrel. There was no evidence that the accused was provoked or that his life was in danger, and the use of a dangerous weapon was unjustified. The accused's intoxication did not excuse or mitigate the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2006] KEHC 407 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Abraham Ewoi Hassan
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Eldoret
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 16 of 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Judgment
- Outcome
- convicted of manslaughter and sentenced to four years' imprisonment
- Legal Topics
- Manslaughter, Unlawful Killing, Sentencing Principles, Mitigation, Use of Deadly Weapon
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Abraham Ewoi Hassan
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused was guilty of manslaughter for causing the death of Silas Oremo Esuba.
- 2 Whether intoxication or provocation mitigated the accused's culpability.
- 3 What sentence was appropriate given the circumstances of the offence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the accused unlawfully caused the death of the deceased by stabbing him with a knife during a quarrel. There was no evidence that the accused was provoked or that his life was in danger, and the use of a dangerous weapon was unjustified. The accused's intoxication did not excuse or mitigate the offence to a significant degree. The severity of the injuries and the reckless conduct of the accused warranted a custodial sentence. The court considered the period already spent in custody and the need for deterrence, ultimately sentencing the accused to four years' imprisonment for manslaughter.
Court Disposition
convicted of manslaughter and sentenced to four years' imprisonment
Orders
- The accused is sentenced to imprisonment for a period of four years.
- The accused has a right of appeal within fourteen days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT ELDORET
Criminal Case 16 of 2005
REPUBLIC:........................................................PROSECUTOR
VERSUS
ABRAHAM ENOI HASSAN:.....................................ACCUSED
JUDGEMENT
The accused, Abraham Ewoi Hassan was charged in this court on 23rd February,2005 with murder contrary to section 203 as read together with section 204 of the Penal Code. He was accused of murdering one Silas Oremo Esuba on 19th January,2005 at Chemororoch village, Tarakwa Location, Soy in Uasin Gishu District.
On the 9th November,2006, the Prosecution applied for substitution of the offence of murder with that of manslaughter contrary to section 202 as read with section 205 of the Penal Code. The new charge was read to the accused and he pleaded guilty to the same. The facts were read out to him and he accepted them to be true and correct. This court then convicted him of the offence of manslaughter.
The facts are that on the 19th January,2005, the accused was at Chemororoch village in Tarakwa Location, Uasin Gishu. At about 7p.m, the accused picked a quarrel with one David Etyang. This culminated in a fight between the accused and the said David Etyang. David then fled to his uncle’s house, Daniel Esuba.
The deceased heard the commotion and went out to find what was happening. He was a cousin to David Etyang and the son of Daniel Esuba. Another quarrel ensued between the accused and the deceased. This led to a fight breaking out. In the course of this fight the accused stabbed the deceased with a knife. The deceased bled profusely. He soon died due to the injury and excessive bleeding. The post-mortem report showed that the deceased died as a result of a stab wound of the left shoulder with severance of the subclavicular artery and vein. There was excessive external hemorrhage.
I have considered the facts of the case and the submissions in mitigation presented by the accused counsel. It was submitted that the accused was under the influence of excessive alcohol at the time of the incident.
I have considered that what took place was an ordinary quarrel which led to a fight. There was no justification for the use of a knife. It cannot be said that the accused’s life was in danger. From the facts, there is no particular allegation that the deceased provoked the accused. The injuries were severe demonstrating that the accused used great force. There was certainly unnecessary force using a dangerous weapon in circumstances.
The accused was wreckless and severed the shoulder artery and vein of the deceased. He did not care as to the extent of injury that could be sustained by the deceased. The alleged excessive use of alcohol did not justify the accused’s conduct.
Considering all the said facts, the mitigation and the age of the accused and taking into account that the life of an innocent human being was taken away due to the accused’s rage and unjustified use of the knife, I think that this court must mete out a sentence that will deter the accused from being a danger to the members of his community and the society in general. A custodial sentence is appropriate.
Having taken into account the period the accused has been in custody since he was arrested, charged and the period from then up to date, I do hereby sentence him to imprisonment for a period of four (4) years.
Orders accordingly.
The Accused has a right of Appeal which may be exercised within FOURTEEN (14) DAYS from the date hereof.
DATED AND DELIVERED AT ELDORET ON THIS 16TH DAY OF NOVEMBER,2006.
M.K.IBRAHIM
JUDGE
FURTHER ORDER
Certified copies of the Judgement to be supplied.