[2021] KEHC 13002 (KLR)
The court found that, although the Penal Code prescribes the death penalty for murder, the Supreme Court decision in Muruatetu permits judicial discretion in sentencing. Considering the gravity of the offence, the violent circumstances, the lack of community support for a non-custodial sentence, and the accused's...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEHC 13002 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic (Director of Public Prosecutions); Defendant: Amos Musiebe alias Jackson Ngonya
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Vihiga
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 21 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Sentencing Ruling After Conviction
- Outcome
- Accused sentenced to 25 years' imprisonment for murder.
- Judges
- DN Musyoka
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Sentencing, Death Penalty, Mitigation, Probation Reports
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic (Director of Public Prosecutions)
Applicant
Amos Musiebe alias Jackson Ngonya
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Sentencing Ruling After Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused should be sentenced to death or a lesser custodial sentence for the offence of murder.
- 2 Whether the circumstances of the offence and mitigation justify deviation from the mandatory death penalty.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that, although the Penal Code prescribes the death penalty for murder, the Supreme Court decision in Muruatetu permits judicial discretion in sentencing. Considering the gravity of the offence, the violent circumstances, the lack of community support for a non-custodial sentence, and the accused's mitigation, the court determined that a custodial sentence was appropriate. The accused was therefore sentenced to 25 years' imprisonment, rather than the mandatory death penalty, reflecting both the seriousness of the crime and the evolving jurisprudence on sentencing discretion.
Court Disposition
Accused sentenced to 25 years' imprisonment for murder.
Orders
- The accused is sentenced to serve 25 years' imprisonment.
- Right of appeal to the Court of Appeal within 14 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
18 paragraphs
RE PUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT VIHIGA
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 21 OF 2021
REPUBLIC.......DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS
VERSUS
AMOS MUSIEBE ALIAS JACKSON NGONYA.....ACCUSED
RULING
1. The accused was convicted, on 31st July 2019, of the offence of murder, contrary to section 203, as read with section 204, of the Penal Code, Cap 63, Laws of Kenya, which exposes him to a penalty death.
2. A statement in mitigation was made on 18th September 2019, by his advocate, Mr. Matete. He stated that the accused was remorseful, for the deceased was his wife, and he, therefore, lost a loved one. They had children of tender years who were living with relatives. He was a first offender, and Mr. Matete prayed for leniency. The prosecution, through Ms. Kibet, stated that the offence committed was a serious one, which called for a deterrent sentence.
3. The court called for a pre-sentence probation report. An undated report was filed on 16th March 2021. It is generally unfavourable to the accused person. The community is still incensed with his actions, and does not favour him being given a non-custodial sentence, and is generally hostile to him being released.
4. I have considered the trial record and the judgment, and in particular the circumstances under which the offence was committed. The accused beat his partner, the woman he was living with, and with whom he had two children, viciously, inflicting upon her fatal injuries. It was not explained why that was so. The two had had a rather violent relationship. The offence, it would appear, was committed when both of them were drunk.
5. Taking everything into account, I am of the persuasion that the accused person herein, would not benefit from a non-custodial sentence. Under section 204 of the Penal Code, the punishment available for the offence, for which he was convicted, is death. However, in view of the decision in Francis Karioko Muruatetu & another vs. Republic [2017] eKLR (Maraga CJ & P, Mwilu DCJ &VP, Ojwang, Wanjala, Njoki and Lenaola SCJJ), with respect to mandatory sentences, and especially the death penalty, the court may consider other modes of punishment.
6. I am persuaded that the accused person herein would benefit from a custodial sentence. I accordingly sentence him to serve 25 years’ imprisonment. There is a right of appeal to the Court of Appeal, exercisable within 14 days. The file shall hereafter be returned to the registry at Vihiga.
7. It is so ordered.
DELIVERED DATED AND SIGNED IN OPEN COURT AT KAKAMEGA THIS 3RD DAY OF JUNE, 2021
W MUSYOKA
JUDGE