[2019] KEHC 8711 (KLR)
The court found that there was no evidence to support the prosecution's allegations that the accused would interfere with investigations. In the absence of compelling reasons and in view of the pre-bail report, the accused was entitled to bond as a matter of right under the Constitution. The court therefore granted...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 8711 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Anjelika Mukoiti
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 12 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Bond
- Outcome
- Bond granted to the accused.
- Judges
- A Mabeya
- Legal Topics
- Bail Application, Pre Bail Report, Bond Conditions
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Anjelika Mukoiti
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Bond
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused is entitled to bond pending trial.
- 2 Whether there are compelling reasons to deny the accused bond.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that there was no evidence to support the prosecution's allegations that the accused would interfere with investigations. In the absence of compelling reasons and in view of the pre-bail report, the accused was entitled to bond as a matter of right under the Constitution. The court therefore granted the accused release on bond with specified terms.
Court Disposition
Bond granted to the accused.
Orders
- The accused may be released on a personal bond of Kshs. 600,000 with a surety of a similar amount.
- Mention set for 18/09/2019 to confirm position.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
13 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU
HIGH COURT CRIMINAL CASE NO 12 OF 2019
REPUBLIC......................................DPP
VERSUS
ANJELIKA MUKOITI.......ACCUSED
RULING ON BOND
1. I have considered the application for bond and the opposition thereto. There is no evidence to back the allegations that the accused is likely to interfere with the investigations. In the circumstances, I am satisfied that the accused is entitled to bond and there are and compelling reasons to deny her the same in view of the pre-bail report.
2. She may be released on a personal bond of Kshs. 600,000 with a surety of a similar amount.
Mention 18/09/2019 to confirm of position.
A. MABEYA
JUDGE
04/04/2019