[2009] KEHC 1969 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution had adduced sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case against the accused, Ann Kathina Kaleve. Consequently, the accused is required to be put on her defence in accordance with the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code. The decision is based on the assessment of the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2009] KEHC 1969 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Ann Kathina Kaleve
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Machakos
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 17 of 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer
- Outcome
- The accused is found to have a case to answer and is put on her defence.
- Judges
- I Lenaola
- Legal Topics
- Prima Facie Case, Case to Answer, Criminal Trial Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Ann Kathina Kaleve
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused to warrant her being put on her defence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution had adduced sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case against the accused, Ann Kathina Kaleve. Consequently, the accused is required to be put on her defence in accordance with the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code. The decision is based on the assessment of the evidence on record, which meets the threshold for a case to answer at this stage of the criminal proceedings.
Court Disposition
The accused is found to have a case to answer and is put on her defence.
Orders
- The accused shall be put on her defence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
12 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MACHAKOS
Criminal Case 17 of 2007
REPUBLIC?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /
VERSUS
ANN KATHINA KALEVE ....................ACCUSED
RULING
1. Having now read the evidence on record, I note that a prima facie case has been established against the accused and she has a case to answer.
2. She will be put on her defence.
3. Orders accordingly.
Dated and delivered at Machakos this 18thday of March2009.
ISAAC LENAOLA
JUDGE