[2011] KEHC 1836 (KLR)
The court, upon reviewing the prosecution's evidence, found that a prima facie case had been established against each of the accused persons. Consequently, in accordance with Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, the accused are required to be put on their defence. The court further directed that the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2011] KEHC 1836 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Anthony Kinuthia Wanjiku; Defendant: Gregory Mwangi Mungai; Defendant: Ismael Onomo
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 97 of 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Prima Facie Case at Close of Prosecution
- Outcome
- Accused persons found to have a case to answer and are put on their defence.
- Judges
- MJA Emukule
- Legal Topics
- Prima Facie Case, Rights of Accused, Criminal Procedure, Section 306 Criminal Procedure Code
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Anthony Kinuthia Wanjiku
Defendant
Gregory Mwangi Mungai
Defendant
Ismael Onomo
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Prima Facie Case at Close of Prosecution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused persons to warrant their being put on their defence.
- 2 What rights are available to the accused at this stage of the proceedings.
Ratio Decidendi
The court, upon reviewing the prosecution's evidence, found that a prima facie case had been established against each of the accused persons. Consequently, in accordance with Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, the accused are required to be put on their defence. The court further directed that the accused be reminded of their rights at this stage, including the right to give evidence on oath and be cross-examined, to make an unsworn statement, to call witnesses, or to remain silent. The defence counsel was called upon to indicate which of these rights each accused would exercise.
Court Disposition
Accused persons found to have a case to answer and are put on their defence.
Orders
- Each accused is reminded of their rights under Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
- Defence counsel to indicate which right each accused will exercise.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
17 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAKURU
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 97 OF 2005
REPUBLIC……………………………….……………………………………………….PROSECUTOR
VERSUS
ANTHONY KINUTHIA WANJIKU………….............….....…...………………………………1ST ACCUSED
GREGORY MWANGI MUNGAI………………................………….…………………………2ND ACCUSED
ISMAEL ONOMO……………………………….........……………...………………………..3RD ACCUSED
RULING
Having perused and collated the evidence, I am of the view that the prosecution has established a prima facie.
In terms of Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, (Cap. 75, Laws of Kenya)the accused are each reminded of their respective rights to give evidence on oath and be subjected to cross-examination, and to call witnesses to testify on their behalf, to give an unsworn statement, and be not subject to cross-examination or to remain silent.
Counsel for the accused is called upon to indicate which of these right the accused or each of them would exercise.
It is so directed.
Dated, signed and delivered at Nakuru this 10th day of June 2011
M. J. ANYARA EMUKULE
JUDGE