[2021] KEHC 329 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 329 (KLR)

The court found that the 1st accused, Anthony Njiba Kamau, is not a first offender, has a prior conviction for stealing, and has negative reports from his ex-wife, the proprietor of Tawisha Bar, and the Nyumba Kumi initiative, all indicating he is a flight risk and a threat to the community. The police affidavit...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 329 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Anthony Njiba Kamau; Respondent: 2 others
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Machakos
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Case 22 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Application to Review Bond Terms
Outcome
application for variation of bond terms denied
Judges
MW Muigai
Legal Topics
Bail and Bond, Flight Risk, Pre Bail Report, Variation of Bond Terms
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Bail and Bond Flight Risk Pre Bail Report Variation of Bond Terms

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Anthony Njiba Kamau

Respondent

2 others

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Case / Ruling on Application to Review Bond Terms

  1. 1 Whether the bond terms for the 1st accused should be reviewed and varied due to inability to raise the set amount.
  2. 2 Whether there are compelling reasons to deny the variation of bond terms for the 1st accused.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the 1st accused, Anthony Njiba Kamau, is not a first offender, has a prior conviction for stealing, and has negative reports from his ex-wife, the proprietor of Tawisha Bar, and the Nyumba Kumi initiative, all indicating he is a flight risk and a threat to the community. The police affidavit further established that the accused went into hiding after the incident and was arrested five months later. Considering these factors, the court held that there are compelling reasons not to vary the bond terms previously set. The application for variation of bond terms was therefore denied, and the accused was ordered to remain on the original bond terms of Kshs.1,000,000 plus...

Court Disposition

application for variation of bond terms denied

Orders

  • The application for variation of bond terms by the 1st accused is denied.
  • The 1st accused shall be released only on the original bond terms of Kshs.1,000,000 plus one surety of like sum as set in the ruling of 4/10/2019.