[2024] KEHC 7541 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution, having called 12 witnesses and produced a postmortem report, established a prima facie case against the accused. The evidence presented, if unchallenged, would be sufficient to support a conviction for murder. Therefore, the accused must be placed on his defence in accordance...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 7541 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: David Arusei alias Mohammed
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case E016 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer at Close of Prosecution's Case
- Outcome
- Accused found with a case to answer and placed on his defence.
- Judges
- RE Aburili
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Prima Facie Case, Burden of Proof, Criminal Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
David Arusei alias Mohammed
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer at Close of Prosecution's Case
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused to warrant him being placed on his defence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution, having called 12 witnesses and produced a postmortem report, established a prima facie case against the accused. The evidence presented, if unchallenged, would be sufficient to support a conviction for murder. Therefore, the accused must be placed on his defence in accordance with Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code and Article 50(2) of the Constitution. The court refrained from evaluating the merits of the evidence in detail at this stage to avoid prejudicing the accused's right to a fair trial.
Court Disposition
Accused found with a case to answer and placed on his defence.
Orders
- The accused, David Arusei alias Mohammed, is found with a case to answer and is placed on his defence.
- Provisions of Article 50(2)(i)(j)(k) of the Constitution and Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code are read out and explained to the accused in the presence of his counsel.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
Republic v Arusei (Criminal Case E016 of 2022) [2024] KEHC 7541 (KLR) (19 June 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 7541 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kisumu
Criminal Case E016 of 2022
RE Aburili, J
June 19, 2024
Between
Republic
Prosecutor
and
David Arusei alias Mohammed
Accused
Ruling
1. The accused person herein is David Arusei alias Mohammed. He is charged with the offence of murder contrary to Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code.
2. Particulars of the offence are that on the diverse dates between the 27th April 2022 and 30th April 2022 while at Milimani Estate, in Miwani Location within Muhoroni Sub-county in Kisumu County, the accused person murdered Julius Arusei.
3. The accused pleaded not Guilty to the charge and the prosecution has called 12 witnesses in support of its case and produced a postmortem Report as an exhibit.
4. The issue now for determination is whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case to warrant the accused to be placed on his defence.
5. A prima facie case is established in criminal cases where the evidence tendered by the prosecution is sufficient on its own for a court to return a guilty verdict but for the right of the accused person to adduce and challenge that evidence, and the right to remain silent as well as the right not to give any self-incriminating evidence.
6. It follows that at this stage, the court cannot delve deep into the merits of the evidence adduced as to do so, where it is of the view that a prima facie case is established, might prejudice the accused person.
7. The defence counsel did request at the close of the prosecution’s case leave to file written submissions which have not been filed as at the time that I am writing this Ruling.
8. Having examined the evidence adduced by the 12 prosecution witnesses I am satisfied that a prima facie case has been established to warrant the accused person to be place on his defence.
9. Accordingly, the accused person, David Arusei alias Mohammed is hereby found with a case to answer and is hereby placed on his defence.
10. The provisions of Article 50(2) (i) (j) (k) of the Constitution as read with Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code are read out and explained to the accused person in the presence of his counsel.
11. I so order.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU THIS 19THDAY OF JUNE, 2024R. E. ABURILIJUDGEPage 2 of 2