[2023] KEHC 3060 (KLR)
The court found that, despite the seriousness of the offence, the unique circumstances—including the absence of a prior criminal record, the relationship between the accused and deceased, the support of both families and the community for reintegration, and the accused's plea of guilty—favoured a lenient sentence....
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEHC 3060 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Anthony Ashikholwa
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kakamega
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case E109 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Sentencing
- Outcome
- The accused was sentenced to seven years imprisonment from the date of arrest, followed by a binding order to keep the peace and be of good conduct for one year, with supervision by the probation officer.
- Judges
- PJO Otieno
- Legal Topics
- Manslaughter, Plea Agreement, Sentencing Guidelines, Victim Impact Statement
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Anthony Ashikholwa
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused should be sentenced to a custodial or non-custodial sentence for manslaughter.
- 2 What weight should be given to the plea agreement, mitigation, and victim impact report in determining sentence.
- 3 Whether section 33 of the Penal Code is applicable in the circumstances.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that, despite the seriousness of the offence, the unique circumstances—including the absence of a prior criminal record, the relationship between the accused and deceased, the support of both families and the community for reintegration, and the accused's plea of guilty—favoured a lenient sentence. The court determined that a custodial sentence of seven years, backdated to the date of arrest, followed by a binding order to keep the peace and be of good conduct under section 33 of the Penal Code, was appropriate. The sentence balanced the objectives of punishment, deterrence, and rehabilitation, while also considering the interests of justice and the community.
Court Disposition
The accused was sentenced to seven years imprisonment from the date of arrest, followed by a binding order to keep the peace and be of good conduct for one year, with supervision by the probation officer.
Orders
- The accused is sentenced to seven years imprisonment, computed from March 10, 2021.
- Upon completion of the custodial sentence, the accused shall enter into a cognizance of Kshs. 100,000 with one surety in the like sum, binding himself to keep the peace and be of good conduct for one year.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
Republic v Ashikholwa (Criminal Case E109 of 2021) [2023] KEHC 3060 (KLR) (12 April 2023) (Sentence)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 3060 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kakamega
Criminal Case E109 of 2021
PJO Otieno, J
April 12, 2023
Between
Republic
Prosecutor
and
Anthony Ashikholwa
Accused
Sentence
1. A plea agreement dated November 22, 2022 and filed in court on the same day, came before court for adoption, was adopted, a negotiated charge of manslaughter was preferred against the accused to which he entered a plea of guilty and was thus convicted for the offence of manslaughter.
2. Pursuant to that plea of guilt and the consequent conviction having been entered, the court directed that a pre-sentencing and/or a victim impact report be filed by the Probation Officer prior to mitigation and sentencing.
3. The pre-sentence and victim impact statement Report was filed on March 28, 2023 and reveals that the accused family as well as the community are open to having him back at home on a non-custodial sentence for purposes of being assisted to reintegrate into society and becoming a responsible and productive citizen. The victim’s family and the family of the accused see no threat to them and the peace of the community at large, if the accused is granted a non-custodial sentence
4. I have taken into account the recommendations made in that report and the mitigation offered by Ms. Aligula, advocate, on behalf of the accused who urged the court to exercise leniency on the accused and to consider that he has saved judicial time by entering a plea agreement. Counsel added that the accused was a friend to the deceased adding that the accused is a father to four children, all minors, but separated from the Mather of the children before the incident and that only a non-custodial sentence will benefit the accused and the family.
5. I have equally taken into consideration the sentiments expressed by Ms. Chala, the prosecuting counsel that the offense for which the accused has been convicted is a serious one and that only a custodial sentence will help him reform. The counsel urges that the accused deserves no leniency by way of a non-custodial sentence.
6. Drawing guidance from the objectives of sentencing in Criminal justice system, and being cognizant of the gravity of the offence for which the accused has been convicted, the age of the accused, that of the deceased and the fact that both were friends and relatives, and that he has no past criminal record, I find that the circumstances of the case and views of the community favours the imposition of a lenient sentence.
7. Having given regard to the above factors and considerations, I determine that the case presents a suitable scenario for the application of section 33 of the Penal Code. I determine that the accused be sentenced to serve an imprisonment term of seven years, computed from the date he was arrested being the March 10, 2021, and thereafter enter into a cognizance in the sum of Kshs. 100,000 with one surety in the like sum, and bind himself to keep the peace and be of good conduct for a period of one year, computed from the date the imprisonment term hereby imposed terminates. It is further ordered that the accused shall not be released from prison before he executes the cognizance.
8. The order to keep the peace and be of good conduct shall be supervised by the probation officer in charge, Kakamega south sub-county for the period of the cognizance.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED IN OPEN COURT THIS 12TH DAY OF APRIL 2023. PATRICK J. O. OTIENOJUDGEIn the presence of:Court Assistant: PolycapMs. Chala for the ProsecutionMs. Aligula for the AccusedAccused – present