[2016] KEHC 3097 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 3097 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had established a clear legal right to payment of the taxed costs, as evidenced by the certificate of order against the Government and the respondent's failure to settle the amount for over 17 months. The absence of opposition from the Attorney General further reinforced the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEHC 3097 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Attorney General; Applicant: Njoroge Regeru & Company Advocates
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Application 136 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Judgment
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Mandamus, Government Liability, Taxed Costs
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Judicial Review Mandamus Government Liability Taxed Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Attorney General

Respondent

Njoroge Regeru & Company Advocates

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to an order of mandamus compelling the Attorney General to pay the taxed costs as per the certificate of order against the Government.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent's failure to settle the taxed costs warrants judicial intervention.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had established a clear legal right to payment of the taxed costs, as evidenced by the certificate of order against the Government and the respondent's failure to settle the amount for over 17 months. The absence of opposition from the Attorney General further reinforced the applicant's entitlement. The court held that an order of mandamus was appropriate to compel the Attorney General to fulfill the statutory obligation to pay the taxed costs, as there was no justification for the continued non-payment. The court also granted the applicant liberty to pursue contempt proceedings in the event of non-compliance and awarded costs of the judicial review...

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • Judicial Review order of Mandamus issued compelling the Attorney General to pay KES 6,500,000 to the applicant as taxed advocate/client costs.
  • The said sums shall be paid within 90 days from the date of the Order of Mandamus.