[2021] KEHC 6427 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 6427 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had previously filed Nairobi HCJR No. 259 of 2019 seeking similar reliefs, was granted leave, but failed to file the substantive application within the statutory timelines. The applicant subsequently withdrew the earlier application, which was marked as closed. By filing the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 6427 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Clement Mwatsama; Respondent: Hon Attorney General; Respondent: Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Tourism and Wildlife
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review Miscellaneous Application E066 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Chamber Summons for Leave to Apply for Mandamus
Outcome
application struck out for abuse of process
Judges
P Nyamweya
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Mandamus, Abuse of Process, Leave to Apply, Withdrawal of Application
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Civil Procedure Judicial Review Mandamus Abuse of Process Leave to Apply Withdrawal of Application

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Clement Mwatsama

Applicant

Hon Attorney General

Respondent

Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Tourism and Wildlife

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Chamber Summons for Leave to Apply for Mandamus

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to leave to apply for an order of mandamus against the respondents for payment of Kshs. 3,777,675.35.
  2. 2 Whether the application constitutes an abuse of the court process due to prior proceedings in Nairobi HCJR No. 259 of 2019.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had previously filed Nairobi HCJR No. 259 of 2019 seeking similar reliefs, was granted leave, but failed to file the substantive application within the statutory timelines. The applicant subsequently withdrew the earlier application, which was marked as closed. By filing the present application on the same subject matter without disclosing the prior proceedings, the applicant engaged in an abuse of the court process. The court confirmed the facts from its own records and held that the applicant, if so minded, should seek appropriate orders in the earlier case rather than initiating fresh proceedings. Consequently, the Chamber Summons dated 20th April...

Court Disposition

application struck out for abuse of process

Orders

  • The Chamber Summons dated 20th April 2021 is hereby struck out for being in abuse of the process of Court.
  • The Deputy Registrar of the Judicial Review Division shall send a copy of this ruling to the Applicant and Respondents by electronic mail by close of business on Thursday, 4th June 2021.