[2017] KEHC 8683 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 8683 (KLR)

The court found that the Chamber Summons for judicial review was improperly brought before it, as there was already another suit (No. 10/07) filed by the applicant on the same subject matter. The applicant's counsel admitted this fact, and the Interested Party confirmed it in the Replying Affidavit. The court...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEHC 8683 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Hon. Attorney General; Respondent: District Land Adj & Settlement Officer, Igembe; Respondent: Adj Officer, Amungenti Adj Section; Applicant: Joshua Murungi Kiambati; Applicant: Andrew Kithela Mwongo; Applicant: Silas Murungi Kiambati; Applicant: John Mwithali; Applicant: Amos Thirinya; Applicant: Japhet Miriti; Applicant: Salesio M'Ikirima; Applicant: Mark Kaunga Mwambi
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application 18 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Withdrawal of Chamber Summons
Outcome
Application withdrawn with costs to the Interested Party.
Judges
LN Mbugua
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Withdrawal of Application, Costs Award, Land Adjudication
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Judicial Review Withdrawal of Application Costs Award Land Adjudication

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Hon. Attorney General

Respondent

District Land Adj & Settlement Officer, Igembe

Respondent

Adj Officer, Amungenti Adj Section

Respondent

Joshua Murungi Kiambati

Applicant

Andrew Kithela Mwongo

Applicant

Silas Murungi Kiambati

Applicant

John Mwithali

Applicant

Amos Thirinya

Applicant

Japhet Miriti

Applicant

Salesio M'Ikirima

Applicant

Mark Kaunga Mwambi

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Withdrawal of Chamber Summons

  1. 1 Whether the Chamber Summons for judicial review should be withdrawn.
  2. 2 Whether costs should be awarded to the Interested Party upon withdrawal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Chamber Summons for judicial review was improperly brought before it, as there was already another suit (No. 10/07) filed by the applicant on the same subject matter. The applicant's counsel admitted this fact, and the Interested Party confirmed it in the Replying Affidavit. The court exercised its discretion to allow the withdrawal of the Chamber Summons and, given the unnecessary duplication of proceedings, awarded costs to the Interested Party.

Court Disposition

Application withdrawn with costs to the Interested Party.

Orders

  • The Chamber Summons dated 24:07:15 and filed on 10:08:15 is withdrawn.
  • Costs awarded to the Interested Party.