[2015] KEHC 4476 (KLR)
The court found that the evidence presented by the prosecution was insufficient to implicate either accused in the murder of Joseph Oyamo Doti. None of the three main witnesses could identify the accused as being involved in the abduction or murder. The only evidence against the 1st accused was from PW1, who saw him...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] KEHC 4476 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Barrack Oluoch Maraga; Defendant: Jack Omondi Ogola
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Migori
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 57 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Trial / Ruling on Withdrawal and Acquittal
- Outcome
- acquittal
- Judges
- DAS Majanja
- Legal Topics
- Murder Charge, Withdrawal of Case, Acquittal, Evidentiary Standards
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Barrack Oluoch Maraga
Defendant
Jack Omondi Ogola
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Trial / Ruling on Withdrawal and Acquittal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the evidence adduced by the prosecution is sufficient to sustain a charge of murder against the accused persons.
- 2 Whether the accused persons should be acquitted or the case withdrawn with liberty to reinstitute proceedings.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the evidence presented by the prosecution was insufficient to implicate either accused in the murder of Joseph Oyamo Doti. None of the three main witnesses could identify the accused as being involved in the abduction or murder. The only evidence against the 1st accused was from PW1, who saw him at the homestead but in circumstances that did not directly connect him to the crime, and there was no evidence placing him at the dispensary or at the scene of death. The 2nd accused was not identified by any witness at any relevant location. The court held that to allow withdrawal with liberty to reinstitute proceedings would be unfair and would permit the prosecution to...
Court Disposition
acquittal
Orders
- Both accused persons are acquitted of the murder of Joseph Oyamo Doti.
- The accused are set free unless otherwise lawfully held.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
19 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MIGORI
HCCR NO. 57 OF 2014
(FORMERLY KISII HCCR NO. 41 OF 2014 )
BETWEEN
REPUBLIC …....................................................................................................PROSECUTOR
AND
BARRACK OLUOCH MARAGA ………………........................................................ ACCUSED
RULING
The accused BARRACK OLUOCH MARAGA and JACK OMONDI OGOLAwere charged with murder contrary to section 203 and 204 of the Penal Code(Chapter 63 of the Laws of Kenya). The information was that on 25th March, 2014 at Magina area within Migori County, they jointly murdered Joseph Oyamo Doti.
The facts leading to the death of the deceased were quite unfortunate. His wife, Benta Akinyi Oyamo, (PW1) recalled that on 25th March, 2014, a gang of boda boda riders came to her homestead demanding that she produce or disclose the whereabouts of her husband, Joseph Oyamo Doti (“the deceased”). After harassment, she told them that he had been admitted to Mariwa Dispensary. The gang left immediately thereafter and proceeded to Mariwa. She does not recall seeing the accused at the scene though she noted that the 1st accused was present and was sympathetic to her and indeed asked the other people not to harass her. Thereafter PW1 was informed that her husband had been found dead at a place called Panyauka.
The other two witnesses, PW2, Joseph Otieno Owira and PW3, Graneth Musolita Kegode, both working at Mariwa Dispensary confirmed that on the material day, a gang of people came to the hospital and took away a patient, Joseph Oyamo Doti who had been admitted to be observation ward. They could not identify any of the members of the gang.
After the evidence of the three witnesses, the learned prosecutor sought to withdraw the case on the ground that the evidence was scanty at this stage. Both counsel for the accused, did not oppose the application but were concerned that their clients should not be subjected to a further trial on the same facts.
As I understand PW1, PW2 and PW3 are the three main witnesses in the matter. As regards the 2nd accused, none of them saw him either at the deceased's homestead or at the Dispensary. There is absolutely no evidence to implicate him.
As regards the 1st accused, the evidence against him can only be accepted with abundant caution since it is only PW1 who saw him in circumstances which were less than salutary. She was afraid at the time and she was being harassed. He was not seen at the dispensary. As to whether he was seen at the mortuary and became subject of recognition, is in doubt as PW1 never recorded in her statement that she knew any of her attackers. Moreover, nothing connects him to the death of the deceased. Even if he was at the scene, he could have withdrawn himself from the gang which went to the dispensary.
In the circumstances, I allow the prosecution to withdraw the case against both accused but in view of the evidence that has been led, to permit the state to prosecute the case at a later stage would allow the prosecution to make up its case and plugs holes in the facts. I therefore have no option but to acquit the accused of the murder of Joseph Oyamo Doti. They are set free unless otherwise lawfully held. The sureties are also hereby discharged.
Dated, signed and delivered in Open Court at Migori this 16th day of June, 2015
D. S. MAJANJA
JUDGE