[2015] KEHC 175 (KLR)
The court held that while the accused is charged with a serious capital offence, bond remains a constitutional right unless compelling reasons exist to deny it. The court considered the accused's inability to raise the initial surety due to his father's death, the favourable pre-bail report indicating a low risk of...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] KEHC 175 (KLR)
- Parties
- Respondent: Republic; Applicant: Ben Ole Mpinding
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisii
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 97 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Bond Review Application
- Outcome
- Bond terms varied; accused granted personal bond with sureties and reporting conditions.
- Judges
- WA Okwany
- Legal Topics
- Bail and Bond, Murder Charge, Pretrial Release, Constitutional Rights
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Respondent
Ben Ole Mpinding
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Bond Review Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the bond terms previously set for the accused should be reviewed in light of changed circumstances.
- 2 Whether the accused is entitled to more lenient bond terms considering his inability to raise the initial surety and his personal circumstances.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that while the accused is charged with a serious capital offence, bond remains a constitutional right unless compelling reasons exist to deny it. The court considered the accused's inability to raise the initial surety due to his father's death, the favourable pre-bail report indicating a low risk of absconding, and the prolonged delay in the commencement of trial. The primary purpose of bond is to secure the accused's attendance at trial, and the court found that the previous bond terms were unduly onerous in the circumstances. Accordingly, the court varied the bond terms to allow the accused release on his own bond of Ksh.500,000 with two sureties of Ksh.100,000 each,...
Court Disposition
Bond terms varied; accused granted personal bond with sureties and reporting conditions.
Orders
- The earlier bond terms are set aside and varied.
- The accused may be released on executing his own personal bond of Ksh.500,000 with two sureties of Ksh.100,000 each.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
29 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KISII
CRIMINAL CASE NO.97 OF 2014
REPUBLIC………………………..PROSECUTOR
VERSUS
BEN OLE MPINDING………………….ACCUSED
RULING
1. The accused herein, BEN OLE MPINDING, who is charged with the offence of Murder contrary to Section 203as read withSection 204of thePenal Code was on 27th February 2015 granted bond by this court, (differently constituted) on the following terms:
“Bond of Kshs.500,000/= with one surety of a similar amount the same to be approved by the Deputy Registrar of this Honourable Court.”
2. On 4th November 2015, when this matter came up for mention, Mr. Ondari, counsel for the accused, applied for a review of the bond terms stated hereinabove while stating that the accused was unable to raise the surety for ksh.500,000/= because his father, who could have been his surety, had died while he was still in custody.
3. Mr. Ondari submitted that the pre-bail report was favourable to the accused and that the accused had young children to fend for. Mr. Ondari added that the accused could be released on a free bond as he would not abscond or a bond of Kshs.100,000/= to enable his mother stand surety for him.
4. Mr. Muhindi counsel for the State opposed the application to review bond terms while emphasizing that the offence was serious.
5. I have considered the application for a review of the bond terms and the response by the state. I note that bond is a constitutional right of an accused person under Article 49 (1) (h) of the Constitution and it is on this basis that the court granted the accused bond in the first place.
6. I note that in assessing the reasonable bond terms to grant an accused person, the court is mandated to consider the gravity of the offence that the accused has been charged with among other considerations. In the instant case, the accused has been charged with a capital offence whose mandatory sentence is death in the event the guilt of the accused is established.
7. It is now more than one year since the accused took plea on the charge of murder yet his trial has not began probably due to the high number of pending cases. The case has not been listed for hearing for the entire time that it has been pending before the court.
8. The pre-bail report filed in respect to the accused showed that he was a family man with a fixed abode and that his chances of jumping bail were slim.
9. In view of the above circumstances and taking into account the fact that the primary goal to granting bond is to ensure that an accused person attends court, I hereby set aside/vary the earlier bond terms granted to the accused and review the same as follows:
The accused may be released on executing his own personal bond of Kshs.500,000/= with two sureties of Ksh.100,000/= each.
The sureties shall be approved by the Deputy Registrar of this court.
Upon his release, the accused shall attend court for mention once every 30 days until his case is heard and determined or until further orders of this court.
In default of (3) above without any justifiable cause the bond shall stand cancelled forthwith and the sureties called to account.
Mention on 20th January, 2016. Hearing on 2nd March 2016.
Dated, signed and delivered in open court this 2nd day of December, 2015
HON. W. OKWANY
JUDGE
In the presence of:
Otieno for the State
Ondari for the Accused
Njoroge: Court clerk