[2014] KEHC 6692 (KLR)
The court found that while the Penal Code prescribes a mandatory death penalty for murder, this provision is inconsistent with the right to life as guaranteed by Article 26(3) of the Constitution. The court considered the mitigation by the accused, including their youth, remorse, time spent in remand, and good...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] KEHC 6692 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Benard Gathiaka Mbugua; Defendant: David Wanyiri Nyaguthie; Defendant: John Mzee Mutuu; Defendant: Daniel Elimlim Ebuke; Defendant: David Kinyagia Mary; Defendant: Francis Wambua Ayiemba; Defendant: Eric Kipkurui Kipkemoi; Defendant: John Karanja Njuguna
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 42 of 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Sentencing Ruling After Conviction for Murder
- Outcome
- Each accused sentenced to twenty years imprisonment from date of arrest.
- Judges
- MJA Emukule
- Legal Topics
- Murder Sentencing, Death Penalty, Constitutional Right to Life
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Benard Gathiaka Mbugua
Defendant
David Wanyiri Nyaguthie
Defendant
John Mzee Mutuu
Defendant
Daniel Elimlim Ebuke
Defendant
David Kinyagia Mary
Defendant
Francis Wambua Ayiemba
Defendant
Eric Kipkurui Kipkemoi
Defendant
John Karanja Njuguna
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Sentencing Ruling After Conviction for Murder
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the mandatory death penalty for murder under Section 204 of the Penal Code is consistent with the right to life under Article 26(3) of the Constitution.
- 2 What is the appropriate sentence for the convicted persons given their mitigation and circumstances.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that while the Penal Code prescribes a mandatory death penalty for murder, this provision is inconsistent with the right to life as guaranteed by Article 26(3) of the Constitution. The court considered the mitigation by the accused, including their youth, remorse, time spent in remand, and good conduct. The court held that the appropriate sentence, balancing the gravity of the offence and the mitigating factors, is twenty years imprisonment for each accused, to commence from the date of their arrest and detention.
Court Disposition
Each accused sentenced to twenty years imprisonment from date of arrest.
Orders
- Each accused is sentenced to twenty years imprisonment to commence from the date of their arrest and detention in prison.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAKURU
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 42 OF 2010
REPUBLIC.........................................................................PROSECUTOR
VERSUS
BENARD GATHIAKA MBUGUA......................................1ST ACCUSED
DAVID WANYIRI NYAGUTHIE.........................................2ND ACCUSED
JOHN MZEE MUTUU......................................................3RD ACCUSED
DANIEL ELIMLIM EBUKE................................................4TH ACCUSED
DAVID KINYAGIA MARY...................................................5TH ACCUSED
FRANCIS WAMBUA AYIEMBA.........................................6TH ACCUSED
ERIC KIPKURUI KIPKEMOI..............................................7TH ACCUSED
JOHN KARANJA NJUGUNA.............................................8TH ACCUSED
RULING
In a judgment delivered on 20th December 2013, I convicted the accused of the felony of murder. This Ruling only relates to the sentence.
2. The penalty or punishment for the felony of murder is death. That is what is provided for in Section 204 of the Penal Code, (Cap. 63, Laws of Kenya).
3. Each of the convicted persons submitted typed statements in mitigation. Bernard Gathiaka Mbugua the 1st accused, pleaded in his statement that he is a 28 year old man. He has been in custody for just over 44 months about 31/2 years. He says that he was about to marry when he was arrested and charged. He says he is a born-again Christian, and is remorseful. He is also a first offender, and says that he has learnt through pain that crime does not pay.
John Mzee Mutuu, the 3rd Accused is now 24 years of age, and has, like the first accused been in custody for the last 31/2 years. He says that the death penalty provided in Section 204 of the Penal Code is antithetical and inconsistent with the letter and spirit of the Constitution. He promises to live within the law and be a peer among his fellow youth against the danger of involving themselves in unlawful deeds or crime.
David Kinyagia Mary, the 5th Accused likewise expressed remorse. He is now 27 years of age, and like his fellow accused has been in custody for 31/2 years.
The mitigation by Eric Kipkurui Kipkemoi alias Boi, the 7th Accused and John Karanja Njuguna, the 8th accused are in similar vein. They have, as remandees, been exemplary and have not broken any prison rules or regulations. They say, they have learnt that“crime does not pay”.
I have considered the mitigation statement by each of the accused, and I treat their statements seriously, and being youth, I sympathise with each and every one of them. They however committed a terrible offence. They unlawfully took away the life of Clement Muguimi, who was doing nothing more than his duty to guard his employer's property upon which these accused and others were trespassing with bravado, and threats which ended in the death of Clement Muguimi.
I agree with each of the accused the death penalty provided for in Section 204 of the Penal Code, is antithetical and inconsistent with the right to life guaranteed under Article 26(3) of the Constitution. The accused however deserved to stay in prison as a punishment for their crime against the deceased, and against society.
Taking into account that the accused may have been led by youth bravado, and the mob of which they were part, and taking into account that the accused have been in remand for over three years, I sentence each of the accused to twenty years imprisonment to commence from the date of their arrest and detention in prison.
There shall be orders accordingly.
Dated, signed and delivered at Nakuru this 28th day of February, 2014
M. J. ANYARA EMUKULE
JUDGE