[2018] KEHC 7555 (KLR)
Despite the accused being a first offender, expressing remorse, having a young family, and having spent nearly 10 years in custody, the court found that the circumstances of the offence—specifically, the savage attack on the deceased, who was the accused's blood brother—were sufficiently grave to warrant a deterrent...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 7555 (KLR)
- Parties
- Respondent: Republic; Defendant: Benard Mati Kathamba
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 47 of 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Sentencing
- Outcome
- accused sentenced to life imprisonment
- Judges
- A Mabeya
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing Principles, Mitigation, Murder, Life Imprisonment
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Respondent
Benard Mati Kathamba
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate sentence for the accused convicted of murder given the circumstances of the offence and mitigation?
- 2 Should the period spent in custody and the accused's personal circumstances affect the sentence imposed?
Ratio Decidendi
Despite the accused being a first offender, expressing remorse, having a young family, and having spent nearly 10 years in custody, the court found that the circumstances of the offence—specifically, the savage attack on the deceased, who was the accused's blood brother—were sufficiently grave to warrant a deterrent sentence. The court considered the positive pre-sentence report but determined that a life sentence, rather than the maximum death penalty, was appropriate in balancing the interests of justice, deterrence, and the mitigating factors presented.
Court Disposition
accused sentenced to life imprisonment
Orders
- The accused is sentenced to life imprisonment.
- The right of appeal within 14 days is explained to the accused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 47 OF 2008
REPUBLIC …………………………...…..………….STATE COUNSEL
VERSUS
BENARD MATI KATHAMBA ………….....……….……….ACCUSED
SENTECING
1. I have considered the mitigation made by the accused. That he is a first offender. That he is a young man and full of life. That he is remorseful and has a young family depending on him.
2. I have also considered that he has been in custody for close to 10 years.
3 However, I have also taken into consideration the circumstances in which the offence was committed. That the accused savagely attacked the deceased, his blood brother.
4. I have considered the Pre-Sentence Report on record that is positive of the accused.
5. However, in view and the circumstances in which the offence was committed, a deterrent sentence would do. The maximum sentence provided for murder is death.
6. I will sentence the accused to life imprisonment.
14 days Right of Appeal explained.
DATED and DELIVERED at MERU this 21st day of MARCH, 2018.
A. MABEYA
JUDGE
21:03:18
In the presence of:-
Court Assistant: Boniface
Mr. Namiti for state
Ms. Nelima for Accused.