[2014] KEHC 350 (KLR)
The court found that, despite the state's reliance on an earlier affidavit citing potential danger to the accused and risk of interference with a key witness, the more recent pre-bail assessment report was favorable to the accused. The report indicated family support and willingness to ensure the accused's...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] KEHC 350 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Benard Mochumbe Nyamorata; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisii
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 122 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Bond Application
- Outcome
- application for bond allowed
- Legal Topics
- Bail and Bond, Murder Charge, Pretrial Release, Compelling Reasons, Judicial Discretion
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Benard Mochumbe Nyamorata
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Bond Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused should be granted bond pending trial for a murder charge.
- 2 Whether there are compelling reasons to deny the accused bond under Article 49(1)(h) of the Constitution.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that, despite the state's reliance on an earlier affidavit citing potential danger to the accused and risk of interference with a key witness, the more recent pre-bail assessment report was favorable to the accused. The report indicated family support and willingness to ensure the accused's attendance at court. The court exercised its discretion in favor of the accused, finding no sufficiently compelling reasons to deny bond, and relied on Article 49(1)(h) of the Constitution, which provides for the right to bail unless compelling reasons exist. The court therefore granted the accused bond with conditions to ensure attendance and compliance.
Court Disposition
application for bond allowed
Orders
- The accused is granted a personal bond of KES 500,000 with one surety of similar amount, to be approved by the Deputy Registrar.
- Upon release, the accused must attend monthly court mentions until the hearing and determination of the case.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KISII
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 122 OF 2013
REPUBLIC…………………………………PROSECUTOR
VERSUS
BENARD MOCHUMBE NYAMORATA……....ACCUSED
RULING.
The accused has made an application for bond. This matter was billed for plea agreement on 5th November, 2014 until the state, suddenly said that they have re-looked at the matter and have come to the conclusion, it is not the matter that is suitable for plea agreement. The state, therefore, will like to proceed and pursue the charge of murder.
That then prompted the application to apply for bond instead, since the trial may, as usual, take a very long time. The same having, therefore, turned down the plea bargaining, we ask that the accused person be given bond. This is that application.
The state did neither object nor supported the accused’s application. However, perusal of the court file reveals that there is in the court an affidavit filed by the investigating officer dated 13th March, 2014. The pertinent paragraphs are 3,4 and 5 thereof.
3 says, the accused released on bail, his life will be in danger as the situation on the ground is volatile.
4 says, accused would be in contact with the key witness who is a minor and a relative to both the deceased and the accused. He may therefore interfere with oral evidence to be tendered against him leading to injustice.
The state therefore says there are compelling reasons why the accused should not be released on bail. The state prays that the court exercises its discretion and deny the accused bail so that the case may be heard and determined on merit. This affidavit was filed in March, 2014.
However, the pre-bail assessment report was filed on 20th June, 2014. In the report is favourable to the accused. The family members are also positive and are willing to help him attend court. Even his brother Simon Orwaru Nyamoraa ID.NO. [particulars withheld], is willing to stand surety for him.
Despite the submissions by the state against release of the accused on bond, the court will be using its discretion in favour of the accused. Article 49(1)(h) of the constitution is, here, forcefully persuasive in this direction.
Accordingly, I allow this application and direct that the accused be given a personal bond of kshs. 500,000 with one surety of similar amount, the bond be approved by the Deputy Registrar of this court.
Upon his release the accused is to attend court mentions of his case every month until the hearing and determination of the same. The first such mention to be on 14th December, 2014. Any default, the bond will be cancelled forth with and the surety be made to account.
It is so ordered.
Dated and delivered at KISII this 14th day of November, 2014.
C.B. NAGILLAH,
JUDGE.
In the presence of:-
Magara holding brief for Sagwe advocate for the applicant.
Majale for the state for the respondent.
Edwin Mongare court clerk.