[2015] KEHC 3745 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 3745 (KLR)

The court found that the circumstances leading to the arrest and prosecution of the 2nd and 3rd accused were the same as those of the 1st accused, Bernard Wainaina Mwangi, who had already been granted bail. There being no opposition from the prosecution and no compelling reasons presented to deny bail, the court...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEHC 3745 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Defendant: John Karianja Kinuthia alias Moha; Defendant: Michael Ndegwa Njau alias Ocampo; Defendant: Bernard Wainaina Mwangi
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Case 46 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Bail Application Ruling
Outcome
applications for bail allowed
Legal Topics
Bail Pending Trial, Bond Terms, Consolidation of Charges
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Bail Pending Trial Bond Terms Consolidation of Charges

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

John Karianja Kinuthia alias Moha

Defendant

Michael Ndegwa Njau alias Ocampo

Defendant

Bernard Wainaina Mwangi

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Case / Bail Application Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the 2nd and 3rd accused persons should be admitted to bail pending trial.
  2. 2 Whether the circumstances of the applicants are similar to those of the 1st accused who was previously granted bail.
  3. 3 What conditions should be attached to the grant of bail to ensure attendance and non-interference with witnesses.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the circumstances leading to the arrest and prosecution of the 2nd and 3rd accused were the same as those of the 1st accused, Bernard Wainaina Mwangi, who had already been granted bail. There being no opposition from the prosecution and no compelling reasons presented to deny bail, the court held that the applicants were entitled to bail on the same terms as the 1st accused. The court further emphasized the need for the applicants to refrain from interfering with witnesses and to attend court as required, warning that any breach would result in cancellation of bail and remand in custody for the remainder of the trial.

Court Disposition

applications for bail allowed

Orders

  • John Karianja Kinuthia alias Moha and Michael Ndegwa Njau alias Ocampo are admitted to bail on the same terms as Bernard Wainaina Mwangi.
  • Each applicant shall execute a bond of KES 1,000,000 with one surety of similar amount.