[2014] KEHC 3366 (KLR)

[2014] KEHC 3366 (KLR)

The court found that the ex parte applicants had established a prima facie case for the grant of leave to apply for judicial review orders of mandamus and prohibition. The court was satisfied that the applicants had demonstrated sufficient grounds to warrant further inquiry into the lawfulness of the respondent's...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] KEHC 3366 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Bomet County Government; Applicant: Leonard Kosgei, Hillary Ngetich, Hudson Njunge, Duncan Kambi, Gladys Laboso (Exparte Applicants)
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kericho
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Application 5 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review Orders
Outcome
Leave granted to apply for orders of mandamus and prohibition; leave to operate as a stay of criminal proceedings pending determination of the substantive application.
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Mandamus, Prohibition Orders, Licensing Disputes, Stay of Proceedings
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Civil Procedure Judicial Review Mandamus Prohibition Orders Licensing Disputes Stay of Proceedings

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Bomet County Government

Respondent

Leonard Kosgei, Hillary Ngetich, Hudson Njunge, Duncan Kambi, Gladys Laboso (Exparte Applicants)

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review Orders

  1. 1 Whether the ex parte applicants have established a prima facie case to warrant leave to apply for orders of mandamus and prohibition.
  2. 2 Whether leave should operate as a stay of criminal proceedings against the applicants pending determination of the substantive application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the ex parte applicants had established a prima facie case for the grant of leave to apply for judicial review orders of mandamus and prohibition. The court was satisfied that the applicants had demonstrated sufficient grounds to warrant further inquiry into the lawfulness of the respondent's actions regarding the issuance of liquor licenses and the institution of criminal proceedings. To preserve the status quo and prevent prejudice to the applicants, the court exercised its discretion to grant leave and directed that such leave operate as a stay of the criminal proceedings in the specified cases pending the hearing and determination of the substantive judicial...

Court Disposition

Leave granted to apply for orders of mandamus and prohibition; leave to operate as a stay of criminal proceedings pending determination of the substantive application.

Orders

  • Leave of ten days granted to the applicants to apply for orders of mandamus and prohibition as sought in prayers 2 and 3 of the summons.
  • Leave granted shall operate as a stay of the criminal proceedings in Principal Magistrate's Court at Bomet Criminal Case Nos. 529/2014, 736/2014, and 531/2014 pending the filing, hearing, and determination of the substantive judicial review application.