[2010] KEHC 3446 (KLR)
The court found that the evidence presented by the prosecution, particularly from PW1 and PW2, was sufficient to establish a prima facie case against the accused. Therefore, the accused is required to be put on his defence to answer the charge of murder as stipulated under section 203 as read with section 204 of the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2010] KEHC 3446 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Bonface Olunga
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kakamega
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 15 of 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer
- Outcome
- Accused found to have a case to answer and is put on his defence.
- Legal Topics
- Murder Charge, Case to Answer, Penal Code Section 203, Penal Code Section 204
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Bonface Olunga
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case to require the accused to be put on his defence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the evidence presented by the prosecution, particularly from PW1 and PW2, was sufficient to establish a prima facie case against the accused. Therefore, the accused is required to be put on his defence to answer the charge of murder as stipulated under section 203 as read with section 204 of the Penal Code.
Court Disposition
Accused found to have a case to answer and is put on his defence.
Orders
- The accused shall be put on his defence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
11 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KAKAMEGA
Criminal Case 15 of 2007
REPUBLIC …………………………………………………… PROSECUTOR
V E R S U S
BONFACE OLUNGA ……………………....……………………….ACCUSED
R U L I N G
The accused person is charged with murder contrary to section 203 as read with section 204 of the Penal Code. From the evidence of PW1 Joseph Olunga Benedict who is the accused’s father and that of PW2, Daniel Wanjala, I find that the accused has a case to answer and he shall be put on his defence.
SAID J. CHITEMBWE
J U D G E
Delivered, dated and counter signed at Kakamega this 11th day of March, 2010
J U D G E