[2019] KEHC 689 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution, through the testimony of seven witnesses and the postmortem report, had established sufficient evidence to make out a prima facie case of murder against the accused. The cause of death was clearly linked to trauma, and the evidence presented was adequate to require the accused...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 689 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Boniface Mutua
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Makueni
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 20 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Trial / Ruling on Case to Answer
- Outcome
- accused placed on defence
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Prima Facie Case, Criminal Procedure, Burden of Proof
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Boniface Mutua
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Trial / Ruling on Case to Answer
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused to warrant his being placed on his defence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution, through the testimony of seven witnesses and the postmortem report, had established sufficient evidence to make out a prima facie case of murder against the accused. The cause of death was clearly linked to trauma, and the evidence presented was adequate to require the accused to be placed on his defence under section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court did not make a finding of guilt at this stage but determined that the prosecution's case met the threshold for the accused to answer to the charge.
Court Disposition
accused placed on defence
Orders
- The accused is hereby placed on his defence under section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
17 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT MAKUENI
HCCR NO. 20 OF 2017
REPUBLIC...................PROSECUTION
-VERSUS-
BONIFACE MUTUA............ACCUSED
RULING
1. Boniface Mutua the accused herein faces a charge of murder contrary to section 203 as read with section 204 of the Penal Code. The deceased was Catherine Mutua.
2. The prosecution called seven (7) witnesses and closed its case. The witnesses have testified on what they saw, heard and did.
3. The postmortem report by Dr. Josephine Mueni (Pw7) shows the cause of death as cardiopulmonary arrest caused by sub-arachnoid hemorrhage following spine injury due to trauma. She explained that there was hemorrhage in the space of the spine and brain.
4. Having considered the evidence adduced by the witnesses, I am satisfied that the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused who I hereby place on his defence under section 306 (2) Criminal Procedure Code.
Orders accordingly.
Delivered, signed & dated this 17th day of December 2019, in open court at Makueni.
……………………………….
H. I. Ong’udi
Judge