[2017] KEHC 7418 (KLR)
The court found that the accused, having pleaded guilty to manslaughter, was criminally liable for the death of the deceased. The facts established that the deceased was the aggressor, entering the accused's house while drunk and carrying a piece of wood. The accused responded by hitting the deceased with the wood,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEHC 7418 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Boniface Mwanzia Mbatha
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Machakos
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 62 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Judgment on Sentence
- Outcome
- convicted and sentenced
- Judges
- DO Ogembo, BC Koech
- Legal Topics
- Manslaughter, Sentencing Principles, Mitigation, Plea of Guilty
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Boniface Mwanzia Mbatha
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Judgment on Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused is criminally liable for the death of the deceased under the offence of manslaughter.
- 2 What is the appropriate sentence for the accused given the circumstances and mitigation.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the accused, having pleaded guilty to manslaughter, was criminally liable for the death of the deceased. The facts established that the deceased was the aggressor, entering the accused's house while drunk and carrying a piece of wood. The accused responded by hitting the deceased with the wood, which ultimately led to the deceased's death due to complications from a leg fracture. The court accepted the accused's remorse and the mitigating circumstances, including his family responsibilities and lack of intent. However, the court emphasized that the sanctity of life must be upheld and that even unintended acts resulting in death warrant punishment. The court determined...
Court Disposition
convicted and sentenced
Orders
- The accused is sentenced to serve six (6) months in jail.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MACHAKOS
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 62 OF 2015
REPUBLIC ............................................PROSECUTOR
VERSUS
BONIFACE MWANZIA MBATHA.................ACCUSED
JUDGMENT ON SENTENCE
1. The accused was charged with offence of Manslaughter contrary to Section 202 as read with Section 205 of the Penal Code (Cap 63, Laws of Kenya). The particulars of the offence are that the accused on the 11th day of May, 2014 at Munyaka village Kathukini Sub-Location in Masinga Sub-County within Machakos County unlawfully killed Patrick Mwangangi Kisilu.
2. The facts of the charge are that on 11th May, 2014at Munyaka village Kathukin Sub-Location in Masinga Sub County in Machakos County at around 9. 00p.m the deceased Patrick Mwangangi Kisilu who was by then drunk went to the house of the accused person and banged his door causing the accused person to open the door and the deceased person forced himself into the house of the accused person and fell on his bed while carrying a piece of wood. The accused person was not happy and took the piece of wood and hit the deceased on his legs prompting the deceased to leave the house of the accused. On 12th May, 2014 the deceased was found by a passerby lying by a roadside. The deceased was escorted to the hospital where he was treated and discharged. On 30th May, 2014 his condition deteriorated and he was taken to hospital. Unfortunately he died on the way to hospital. On 2nd June, 2014 the doctor conducted a postmortem and formed opinion that the cause of death was cardiopulmonary arrest due to hypostatic limonia which was caused by left lower limb fracture. The State had produced the postmortem report in court as exhibit No. 1. The accused and the deceased were known to each other prior to the occurrence of the offence.
3. The accused pleaded guilty to the charge. The State Prosecutor submitted that the accused be treated as first offender. In mitigation the accused’s counsel Mr. Kyalo submitted that the accused person is a family man with two young children and old sickly parents. The accused did not intend to commit the offence and is remorseful.
4. I have carefully considered the charge and the plea of guilt by the accused person. From the facts of the case it appears that the deceased was the sole aggressor in this matter. The deceased at night while drunk went to the house of the accused, banged the door and forced himself into the house of the accused person, and fell into his bed while carrying a piece of wood. The accused person, being not happy with such conduct, hit the deceased with the said piece of wood. This led to the deceased death after several days and after treatment. Whatever may have transpired between the two was not intended. The accused appears to regret the same, and the court believes him.
5. However, a life which is precious was lost, and this court cannot ignore that fact. The court is obligated to send out a clear signal that it is the small, unintended fights, which finally lead to death, and that people need not engage in any hostilities at all. If the accused person had refrained from hitting the deceased, the deceased would be alive today. The accused person must then suffer the consequences of his action, even if the court severely reduces such consequence.
6. This court is satisfied that a deterrence sentence is necessary, and herewith sentences the accused person to serve six (6) months in jail.
7. That is the judgment of the court.
…………………
E.K.O. OGOLA
JUDGE
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT MACHAKOS THIS 15TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2017
……………….
DAVID KEMEI
JUDGE
In the presence of:
Muthama – for accused
Machogu - for State