[2006] KEHC 1242 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had complied with all procedural requirements for leave to apply for judicial review, including filing within six months of the impugned decision as required by Order LIII Rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The applicant raised substantial issues regarding the jurisdiction of the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2006] KEHC 1242 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Busia Municipal Land Disputes Tribunal; Interested Party: Rosa Nekesa Ouma; Applicant: Patrick Ouma Wabwire
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Busia
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- ? 62 of 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Leave for Judicial Review and Stay
- Outcome
- Leave to apply for judicial review granted; leave to operate as stay of execution.
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Jurisdiction of Tribunals, Locus Standi, Limitation of Actions
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Busia Municipal Land Disputes Tribunal
Respondent
Rosa Nekesa Ouma
Interested Party
Patrick Ouma Wabwire
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Leave for Judicial Review and Stay
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Busia Municipal Land Disputes Tribunal had jurisdiction to determine the interested party's claim over land parcel BUKHAYO/MUNDIKA/1106.
- 2 Whether the interested party had locus standi to institute proceedings without letters of administration for the deceased's estate.
- 3 Whether the claim before the Tribunal was statute barred under the Limitation of Actions Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had complied with all procedural requirements for leave to apply for judicial review, including filing within six months of the impugned decision as required by Order LIII Rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The applicant raised substantial issues regarding the jurisdiction of the Busia Municipal Land Disputes Tribunal, the locus standi of the interested party who had not obtained letters of administration, and the possible statutory bar under the Limitation of Actions Act. These issues warranted further examination at the substantive hearing. Accordingly, the court granted leave to apply for orders of certiorari and ordered that such leave operate as a...
Court Disposition
Leave to apply for judicial review granted; leave to operate as stay of execution.
Orders
- Leave is granted to the applicant to apply for orders of certiorari to quash the Busia Municipal Land Disputes Tribunal award as adopted by the SRM's Court at Busia in Busia Land Case No.10 of 2006.
- Leave granted shall operate as a stay of execution of the decree in Busia SRM Land Case No.10 of 2006 pending hearing and determination of the judicial review application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
33 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT BUSIA
MISC CIV APPLI 62 OF 2006
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW
AND
IN THE MATTER OF THE LAND DISPUTES TRIBUNAL
AND
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY PATRICK OUMA WABWIRE FOR LEAVE TO APPLY FOR ORDERS OF CERTIORARI
BETWEEN
REPUBLIC.................................................................................................................................APPLICANT
VS
BUSIA MUNICIPAL LAND DISPUTES TRIBUNAL.....................................................RESPONDENT
AND
ROSA NEKESA OUMA........................................................................................INTERESTED PARTY
RULING
By an application dated 25th June, 2006, by way of Chamber summons, pursuant to the provisions of Order LIII Rule 1 (3) of the Civil Procedure Rules, the applicant seeks orders:
1 That the applicant PATRICK OUMA WABWIRE be granted leave to apply for orders of certiorari to bring into the High Court and quash the Busia Municipal Land Disputes Tribunal award as adopted by the SRM’S Court at Busia in Busia Land Case No.10 of 2006.
2 That leave granted do operate as stay of execution of the decree in Busia SRM Land Case No.10 of 2006 pending the hearing and determination of the Judicial Review application herein.
The application is grounded on matters set out in the statement and is predicated upon the affidavit of Patrick Ouma Wabwire.
For the applicant, it was argued that he (applicant) is the grandson of the late Gabriel Opondo Bunde who passed on in or about 1983 while registered as a proprietor of land parcel BUKHAYO/MUNDIKA/1106.
That the interested party is a sister to Gabriel Opondo Bunde and have not yet obtained letters of administration in respect of the deceased’s estate.
In that capacity, the interested party has filed a claim before the Busia Municipal Land Disputes Tribunal in the year 2005 for purposes of obtaining title to a portion of land parcel BUKHAYO/MUNDIKA/1106 belonging to the late Gabriel Opondo Bunde.
That the said Busia Municipal Land Disputes Tribunal allowed the interested party’s claim. On 22nd February, 2006 the Busia SRM Court adopted the award of the said Tribunal as a judgment of the court in Busia Land Case No.10 of 2006.
It is the contention of the applicant that the Busia Land Disputes Tribunal lacked the jurisdiction to entertain the interested party’s request under Section 3 of the Land Disputes Tribunal and Section 159 of the Registered Land Act (Cap 300) Laws of Kenya. That in any event the interested party equally lacked the locus-standi to institute the proceedings without first having taken out the letters of administration in respect of the estate of her deceased’s brother.
The applicant last and most important contention is that the interested party’s claim before the Busia Land Disputes Tribunal is statute barred by virtue of the Limitation of Actions Act.
I have analyzed the evidence in support of the application and note particularly that the decision challenged was made on 22nd February 2006, a period of less than 6 months as prescribed by Order LIII Rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules. I equally note that all the requirements under Order LIII Rules 1(2) and 1(3) have been complied with.
Accordingly, I grant the application in terms of prayer 1 and 2 of the application.
By way of direction, the applicant shall file the Notice of Motion as provided by Order LIII, rule 3, 21 days from the date of this order.
DATED and DELIVERED at Busia this 31st day of July 2006.
N.R.O. OMBIJA
JUDGE
Mr. Bogonko for applicant.