[2016] KEHC 1155 (KLR)
Despite the accused's youth, remorse, and the probation officer's recommendation for a non-custodial sentence, the court found the offence particularly heinous as it involved a mother killing her own child for personal gain. The court held that the accused was old enough to understand the consequences of her actions...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] KEHC 1155 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: C O
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisii
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 10 of 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Sentencing
- Outcome
- convicted and sentenced
- Judges
- WA Okwany
- Legal Topics
- Manslaughter, Plea Bargain, Sentencing Principles, Mitigation, Parental Offences
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
C O
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused should be sentenced to a custodial or non-custodial sentence for manslaughter.
- 2 Whether the mitigation and probation officer's report justify leniency.
Ratio Decidendi
Despite the accused's youth, remorse, and the probation officer's recommendation for a non-custodial sentence, the court found the offence particularly heinous as it involved a mother killing her own child for personal gain. The court held that the accused was old enough to understand the consequences of her actions and had alternative options, such as rejecting the job offer or seeking adoption for the child. The gravity and cruelty of the offence outweighed the mitigating factors, and the court determined that a custodial sentence was necessary to reflect the seriousness of the crime and uphold respect for human life.
Court Disposition
convicted and sentenced
Orders
- The accused is sentenced to serve 7 years imprisonment from the date of her first court appearance.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KISII
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 10 OF 2016.
REPUBLIC......................................PROSECUTOR
VERSUS
C O .......................................................ACCUSED
SENTENCE
1. C O,the accused herein was charged with the offence of murder contrary to Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code. By a plea bargain agreement made between the state through the prosecution and the accused on 7th November 2016, the accused agreed to plead guilty to a lesser charge of manslaughter contrary to Section 202 as read with Section 205 of the Penal Code. The particulars of the offence were that on the night of 11th April 2016, at Iyabe Location in Kisii South District within Kisii County, unlawfully caused the death of M M.
2. The accused pleaded guilty to the charge of manslaughter and was accordingly convicted on her own plea of guilty. The facts of the case were that on 9th April 2016, the accused secured employment in Nairobi as a house maid but her prospective employer was emphatic that she could not take up the job if she was accompanied by her two year old child M the deceased herein. Faced with the task of making a decision between accepting the Nairobi job offer or staying back at home with her baby, the accused and her husband one J O, on 10th April 2016 hatched a plan to get rid of the child by dumping her in a river as it then appeared to them that the child was becoming an obstacle to the accused’s job prospects.
3. The accused actualized their evil plan by dumping the child into Iyabe River at night and the lifeless body of the child was recovered from the said river on 12th April 2016.
4. In mitigation, Mr. Okenye for the accused submitted that she was a young girl aged 20 years and that she was remorseful for the offence.
5. The Probation Officer’s report filed in court on 25th November 2016 revealed that the accused could benefit from a non-custodial sentence.
6. I have carefully considered the circumstances surrounding this case, the mitigation tendered by Mr. Okenye advocate for the accused and the contents of the probation officer’s report.
7. The accused was the mother of the deceased yet she had no qualms about ending her own baby’s life so that she could be “free” to take up a job offer in Nairobi.
8. It is inconceivable and indeed, difficult to comprehend how a sane mother can be so cruel to her own child to the extent of ending her young innocent life on the ground that the child had become an obstacle to her job prospects. Considering that the job of a house-maid entails taking care of young children, one wonders what sort of a maid the accused could have been if she had the guts to mercilessly kill her own child.
9. I find that the accused was old enough to know the consequences of her actions. She had several options at her disposal to either reject the job offer, give up the child to a children’s home for adoption or leave her with her parents but she chose to do the unthinkable by throwing the baby into the raging river.
10. The actions of the accused portray her as a heartless human being who does not deserve the leniency of this court. The accused must take full responsibility her heinous crime which to me, is a demonstration of how low the human race has sunk in terms of respect for human life.
11. The contents and recommendations of the probation officer notwithstanding I still find that the offence committed by the accused calls for a custodial sentence.
12. Consequently, I sentence the accused to serve 7 years imprisonment which sentence shall run from the date of her first court appearance.
Delivered, dated and signed in at Kisii on 28th of November, 2016.
W.A. OKWANY
JUDGE
In the presence of:
- Miss. Mbelete for the State
- Mr. Kaburi for Okenye for the Accused
- Omwoyo court clerk