[2020] KEELC 577 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants had established an arguable case warranting leave to apply for judicial review orders of certiorari and prohibition against the decision of the 1st respondent concerning the specified land parcels. The court was satisfied that the threshold for leave had been met, and that it was...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEELC 577 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Cabinet Secretary in Charge of Lands and Physical Planning; Respondent: Director of Adjudication; Respondent: Chief Land Registrar; Respondent: Attorney General; Interested Party: Njeru Kiririka; Applicant: Daglas Kanga Shadrack; Applicant: Mbungu Nkari; Applicant: M’Kea M’Iburuara; Applicant: Jediel Rwanda Njue
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Chuka
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Judicial Review Miscellaneous Application E001 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Leave to Apply for Judicial Review
- Outcome
- Leave granted to apply for judicial review; interim stay of impugned decision ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Certiorari, Prohibition Orders, Land Adjudication, Ministerial Appeals
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Cabinet Secretary in Charge of Lands and Physical Planning
Respondent
Director of Adjudication
Respondent
Chief Land Registrar
Respondent
Attorney General
Respondent
Njeru Kiririka
Interested Party
Daglas Kanga Shadrack
Applicant
Mbungu Nkari
Applicant
M’Kea M’Iburuara
Applicant
Jediel Rwanda Njue
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Leave to Apply for Judicial Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants have established sufficient grounds for leave to apply for judicial review orders of certiorari and prohibition.
- 2 Whether the decision of the 1st respondent dated 3/9/2020 and issued on 9/10/2020 should be stayed pending determination of the substantive application.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants had established an arguable case warranting leave to apply for judicial review orders of certiorari and prohibition against the decision of the 1st respondent concerning the specified land parcels. The court was satisfied that the threshold for leave had been met, and that it was just to grant interim stay of the impugned decision to preserve the status quo pending the hearing and determination of the substantive application. Accordingly, the court granted prayers 1a, 1b, and 1c of the application, allowing the applicants to proceed with their judicial review challenge and staying the implementation of the contested decision.
Court Disposition
Leave granted to apply for judicial review; interim stay of impugned decision ordered.
Orders
- Leave is granted to the applicants to apply for orders of certiorari and prohibition.
- An order of stay is issued, suspending the implementation of the 1st respondent's decision dated 3/9/2020 and issued on 9/10/2020 until determination of the substantive application or further orders of the court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
56 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT CHUKA
MISC. JUDICIAL REVIEW APPLICATION NO. E001 OF 2020
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPLY FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW ORDERS OF CERTIORARI AND PROHIBITION
AND
IN THE MATTER OF ARTICLE 23(3) (F), 40,48 & 50 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA
AND
IN THE MATTER OF FAIR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION ACT, 2015
AND
IN THE MATTER OF LAND PARCEL NO’S P/NO.1413,P/NO.1414,P/NO/1418 & P/NO/1412 KAMWIMBI ‘A’ ADJUDICATION SECTION
AND
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL TO THE MINISTER IN CHARGE OF LANDS AND PHYSICAL PLANNING CASE NO, 95 0F 2015
AND
IN THE MATTER OF THE LAND ADJUDICATION ACT CAP 284 LAWS OF KENYA
AND
IN THE MATTER OF SECTIONS 8 AND 9 OF THE LAW REFORM ACT CAP 26 LAWS OF KENYA
BETWEEN
REPUBLIC........................................................................................ APPLICANT
VERSUS
CABINET SECRETARY IN CHARGE OF LANDS
AND PHYSICAL PLANNING...............................................1ST RESPONDENT
THE DIRECTOR OF ADJUDICATION..............................2ND RESPONDENT
CHIEF LAND REGISTRAR..................................................3RD RESPONDENT
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL RESPONDENT...................4TH RESPONDENT
AND
NJERU KIRIRIKA............................................................. INTERESTED PARTY
AND
DAGLAS KANGA SHADRACK
MBUNGU NKARI
M’KEA M’IBURUARA
JEDIEL RWANDA NJUE..............................................EXPARTE APPLICANTS
RULING
1. This application was brought to court pursuant to Order 53 Rules 1 and 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules 2010 and is in the following format:
CHAMBER SUMMONS
(Pursuant to Order 53 rules 1 and 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules 2010)
LET ALL PARTIES CONCERNED attend the Learned Judge in Chambers on the …………Day of …………….. 2020 at 9. 00 o’clock in the forenoon or soon thereafter when the counsel for the Applicant may be heard for ORDERS:
1. THAT leave do issue for the Applicant to apply for
a) AN ORDER OF CERTIORARI to remove into the Honourable Court and quash the decision of the 1ST Respondent contained in the ruling issued on 3/9/2020.
b) AN ORDER OF PROHIBITION directed towards the 2ND & 3RD respondent prohibiting the respondent from relying on and or effecting the decision contained in the ruling dated 3/9/2020 and issued on 9/10/2020.
c) The leave so granted do operate as a stay of the decision until the determination of the substantive application or until further orders of the court are issued.
2. THAT the court grants all the necessary and consequential orders/directions thereof as Necessary.
3. THAT Costs of this application be provided for.
WHICH APPLICATION is based on the grounds set out in the Statutory Statement annexed hereto and the verifying affidavit of JEDIEL RWANDA NJUE and on further grounds to be adduced at the hearing.
DATED at Embu this................................day of..................................................2020
WINNIE NGIGI & ASSOCIATES
ADVOCATES FOR THE APPLICANTS
2. On 23rd November, 2020, Miss Ngigi, the applicant’s advocate told the court that she had served the application upon the respondents.
3. I have perused the application and its annextures.
4. Prayers 1a,1b and 1c in the application are granted.
5. Costs shall be in the cause.
6. Application to be served upon the respondents and mention for directions on 25/1/2021.
Delivered in open court at Chuka this 23rd day of November, 2020 in the presence of;
CA: Ndegwa
Miss Ngigi for the Applicant.
P. M. NJOROGE
JUDGE.