[2020] KEELC 577 (KLR)

[2020] KEELC 577 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants had established an arguable case warranting leave to apply for judicial review orders of certiorari and prohibition against the decision of the 1st respondent concerning the specified land parcels. The court was satisfied that the threshold for leave had been met, and that it was...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEELC 577 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Cabinet Secretary in Charge of Lands and Physical Planning; Respondent: Director of Adjudication; Respondent: Chief Land Registrar; Respondent: Attorney General; Interested Party: Njeru Kiririka; Applicant: Daglas Kanga Shadrack; Applicant: Mbungu Nkari; Applicant: M’Kea M’Iburuara; Applicant: Jediel Rwanda Njue
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Chuka
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review Miscellaneous Application E001 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Leave to Apply for Judicial Review
Outcome
Leave granted to apply for judicial review; interim stay of impugned decision ordered.
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Certiorari, Prohibition Orders, Land Adjudication, Ministerial Appeals
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Land and Property Judicial Review Certiorari Prohibition Orders Land Adjudication Ministerial Appeals

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Cabinet Secretary in Charge of Lands and Physical Planning

Respondent

Director of Adjudication

Respondent

Chief Land Registrar

Respondent

Attorney General

Respondent

Njeru Kiririka

Interested Party

Daglas Kanga Shadrack

Applicant

Mbungu Nkari

Applicant

M’Kea M’Iburuara

Applicant

Jediel Rwanda Njue

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Leave to Apply for Judicial Review

  1. 1 Whether the applicants have established sufficient grounds for leave to apply for judicial review orders of certiorari and prohibition.
  2. 2 Whether the decision of the 1st respondent dated 3/9/2020 and issued on 9/10/2020 should be stayed pending determination of the substantive application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants had established an arguable case warranting leave to apply for judicial review orders of certiorari and prohibition against the decision of the 1st respondent concerning the specified land parcels. The court was satisfied that the threshold for leave had been met, and that it was just to grant interim stay of the impugned decision to preserve the status quo pending the hearing and determination of the substantive application. Accordingly, the court granted prayers 1a, 1b, and 1c of the application, allowing the applicants to proceed with their judicial review challenge and staying the implementation of the contested decision.

Court Disposition

Leave granted to apply for judicial review; interim stay of impugned decision ordered.

Orders

  • Leave is granted to the applicants to apply for orders of certiorari and prohibition.
  • An order of stay is issued, suspending the implementation of the 1st respondent's decision dated 3/9/2020 and issued on 9/10/2020 until determination of the substantive application or further orders of the court.