[2021] KEELC 3679 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 3679 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants had established a prima facie case warranting the grant of leave to apply for judicial review orders of certiorari, prohibition, and mandamus against the respondents. The court was satisfied that the applicants' grievances regarding the decision and award of the 1st respondent,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELC 3679 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Joseph Mutemi Nkuno; Applicant: Moses Nkuno Makembo; Respondent: The Cabinet Secretary, Ministry of Lands and Physical Planning; Respondent: The Hon. Attorney General; Interested Party: Gerevasio Mugao Nyaga
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Chuka
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review Application E004 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ex Parte Leave Application Ruling
Outcome
Leave granted for judicial review; stay of implementation of impugned decision; costs in the cause.
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Land Adjudication, Certiorari, Prohibition, Mandamus
Source Language
en
Land and Property Administrative Law Judicial Review Land Adjudication Certiorari Prohibition Mandamus

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Joseph Mutemi Nkuno

Applicant

Moses Nkuno Makembo

Applicant

The Cabinet Secretary, Ministry of Lands and Physical Planning

Respondent

The Hon. Attorney General

Respondent

Gerevasio Mugao Nyaga

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ex Parte Leave Application Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the applicants have established a prima facie case for leave to apply for judicial review orders of certiorari, prohibition, and mandamus against the respondents.
  2. 2 Whether the decision and award of the 1st respondent relating to Kamarandi ‘B’ Adjudication section – parcel no. 73 should be stayed pending determination of the intended judicial review proceedings.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants had established a prima facie case warranting the grant of leave to apply for judicial review orders of certiorari, prohibition, and mandamus against the respondents. The court was satisfied that the applicants' grievances regarding the decision and award of the 1st respondent, which affected their proprietary interests in Kamarandi ‘B’ Adjudication section – parcel no. 73, raised arguable issues suitable for judicial review. The court further held that it was appropriate to grant leave to operate as a stay of the implementation of the impugned decision to preserve the status quo pending the hearing and determination of the intended judicial review...

Court Disposition

Leave granted for judicial review; stay of implementation of impugned decision; costs in the cause.

Orders

  • Leave is granted to the applicants to apply for an order of certiorari to quash the decision and award of the 1st respondent dated 18-11-2020 relating to Kamarandi ‘B’ Adjudication section – parcel no. 73.
  • Leave is granted to the applicants to apply for an order of prohibition to prohibit the 1st respondent from issuing a title in favour of the interested party in respect of Kamarandi ‘B’ Adjudication section – parcel no. 73.