[2011] KEHC 2076 (KLR)
The court held that under Article 49(1)(h) of the Constitution, the accused is entitled to bail unless compelling reasons are provided by the prosecution to justify denial. In this case, the prosecution did not oppose the application and provided no compelling reasons against bail. The court also considered the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2011] KEHC 2076 (KLR)
- Parties
- Respondent: Republic; Applicant: Caroline Wanderi Mumo
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Embu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Murder Case 36 of 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Murder Case / Bail Application Ruling
- Outcome
- application_allowed
- Judges
- AO Muchelule
- Legal Topics
- Bail Pending Trial, Murder Charge, Constitutional Rights, Compelling Reasons
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Respondent
Caroline Wanderi Mumo
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Murder Case / Bail Application Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused is entitled to bail pending trial under Article 49(1)(h) of the Constitution.
- 2 Whether there are compelling reasons to deny bail to the accused.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that under Article 49(1)(h) of the Constitution, the accused is entitled to bail unless compelling reasons are provided by the prosecution to justify denial. In this case, the prosecution did not oppose the application and provided no compelling reasons against bail. The court also considered the accused's family circumstances, specifically her two dependent children, and the lack of objection from the State. Consequently, the court granted bail to the accused, subject to the execution of a bond and provision of a surety, taking into account the gravity of the charge.
Court Disposition
application_allowed
Orders
- The accused shall be released on bail upon signing a bond of KShs. 500,000 and providing one surety of a similar amount.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
15 paragraphs
REPUBLICOF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT EMBU
MURDER CASE NO. 36 OF 2010
REPUBLIC……………………………..........................……………..PROSECUTION
VERSUS
CAROLINE WANDERI MUMO…………................................……………..ACCUSED
R U L I N G
The Accused was charged with murder contrary to Sections 203 and 204 of the Penal Code whose particulars are that on 14th October 2010 at Kanjarara village in Kirinyaga County within Central Province she murdered Stephen Mumo Kibathi. She denied the charge and her trial will be on 10th October this year. She asks to be released on bail pending the hearing and determination of her case. The application was made on her behalf by Mr. Nduku. Ms. Matiru appeared for the State and did not oppose the application. She informed the court that the deceased was the husband of the accused and that the two had a domestic quarrel that resulted into the death. She indicated that there were discussions going on to have the charge reduced to manslaughter.
In the affidavit sworn by the accused’s counsel in support of the application, it was indicated the accused was left with two children, aged 15 and 8, respectively, who are now destitute and out of school owing to this incarceration.
The application was brought under Section 357(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code and Article 49(1) (h) of the Constitution. Section 357(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code is in relation to bail pending appeal and is therefore not relevant to this application. The accused is, however, entitled to be released on bail under Article 49(1) (h) of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010 unless there are compelling reasons not to be released. Such reasons would usually come from the prosecution which has preferred the charge. In this case no reason has been given, and in fact the State counsel has joined in the quest to have the accused released on bail.
I allow the application. Given the gravity of the charge, I ask that the accused signs a bond of KShs.500,000/= and to provide one surety in similar amount.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED THIS 28TH DAY OF JULY 2011.
A.O. MUCHELULE
JUDGE