[2008] KEHC 2189 (KLR)

[2008] KEHC 2189 (KLR)

The court found that the Tribunal's award and its adoption by the Resident Magistrate were based on the mutual agreement of the parties to subdivide and share the land in question. There was no evidence of dispute regarding trust or fraud, and the order was entered on the admission of the parties. The grounds...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2008] KEHC 2189 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Central Division Land Dispute Tribunal Kirinyaga and 3 others; Interested Party: Magongu Kamanda
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Embu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 30 of 2007
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Certiorari
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Certiorari, Land Disputes, Tribunal Awards
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Judicial Review Certiorari Land Disputes Tribunal Awards

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Central Division Land Dispute Tribunal Kirinyaga and 3 others

Respondent

Magongu Kamanda

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Certiorari

  1. 1 Whether the award of the Kerugoya Central Division Land Dispute Tribunal and its adoption by the Resident Magistrate should be quashed by certiorari.
  2. 2 Whether there was non-compliance with section 3(1) and 13(3) of Act 18/1990.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Tribunal's award and its adoption by the Resident Magistrate were based on the mutual agreement of the parties to subdivide and share the land in question. There was no evidence of dispute regarding trust or fraud, and the order was entered on the admission of the parties. The grounds advanced by the applicant, namely non-compliance with section 3(1) and 13(3) of Act 18/1990, were not substantiated in the context of the parties' agreement. Therefore, the court upheld the award of the Tribunal and dismissed the application for certiorari.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for certiorari is dismissed.
  • The award of the Kerugoya Central Division Land Dispute Tribunal and its adoption by the Resident Magistrate are upheld.