[2011] KEHC 534 (KLR)
The court found that the Evurore Land Disputes Tribunal acted outside its statutory jurisdiction by making orders for the transfer and subdivision of land registered under the Registered Land Act. The Land Disputes Act does not empower the Tribunal to determine issues of title or effectuate transfers of registered...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2011] KEHC 534 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Chairman Evurore Land Disputes Tribunal; Respondent: Principal Magistrate Siakago; Interested Party: Namu Murigo; Applicant: Nyaga Cingano
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Embu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Judicial Review 16 of 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Ruling
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction of Land Disputes Tribunal, Certiorari, Prohibition Orders, Registered Land Act, Ultra Vires Actions
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Chairman Evurore Land Disputes Tribunal
Respondent
Principal Magistrate Siakago
Respondent
Namu Murigo
Interested Party
Nyaga Cingano
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Evurore Land Disputes Tribunal had jurisdiction to determine matters involving registered land under the Registered Land Act.
- 2 Whether the orders made by the Tribunal and adopted by the Principal Magistrate's Court were ultra vires and liable to be quashed.
- 3 Whether prohibition should issue to restrain execution of the Tribunal's award.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Evurore Land Disputes Tribunal acted outside its statutory jurisdiction by making orders for the transfer and subdivision of land registered under the Registered Land Act. The Land Disputes Act does not empower the Tribunal to determine issues of title or effectuate transfers of registered land. The Tribunal's actions were therefore ultra vires and void. The adoption of the Tribunal's award by the Principal Magistrate's Court did not cure the jurisdictional defect. The court further noted procedural irregularities and inconsistencies in the Tribunal's handling of related cases involving the same parcel and parties. Consequently, the court granted orders of...
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The decision of the Evurore Land Disputes Tribunal in Case No. 320/2009, as read in court before the Principal Magistrate Siakago as LDT No. 11/09, is quashed.
- The respondents are prohibited from executing the award in Tribunal Case No. 320/2009 and the decree in Siakago Principal Magistrate’s Court No. 11/2009.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT EMBU
JUDICIAL REVIEW NO. 16 OF 2010
REPUBLIC………………………………………………………….........…….……………………..APPLICANT
VERSUS
CHAIRMAN EVURORE LAND DISPUTES TRIBUNAL ……….........................….………..1ST RESPONDENT
PRINCIPAL MAGISTRATE SIAKAGO………………….…..................…………………….2ND RESPONDENT
NAMU MURIGO……..…….……………..……………..….................…………………….INTERESTED PARTY
NYAGA CINGANO……………………………………….…................…………………EX-PARTE APPLICANT
R U L I N G
This is the Exparte Applicant’s Notice of Motion dated 18/5/2010 under Order 53 Rule 3(1) Civil Procedure Rule and Section 8 and 9 Law Reform Act. It’s for orders of:-
1. Certiorari quashing the orders made by the 1st Respondent on 5/10/2009 in Tribunal Case No. 320/2009 and adopted as the Judgment of the Principal Magistrate’s Court Siakago on 11/3/2010.
2. Prohibition order to restrain the Respondents whether by themselves or through their agents or servants or any of them from executing the award made by the Land Disputes Tribunal in Case No. 320 of 2009 and adopted as a Judgment of the Principal Magistrate’s Court Siakago on 11/3/2010.
The Applicants’ contention is whether the Evurore Land Disputes Tribunal had jurisdiction to deal with his land EMBU/IRIAITUNE/1678 which is registered under the Registered Land Act. In Land Disputes Tribunal Case No. 320/09 at Evurore, the Tribunal made the following orders:-
1. The parcel No. 1678 be transferred to one Namu Murigo as a trustee of Ngugi Clan.
2. The parcel to be thereafter subdivide to members of Ngugi Clan of which Nyaga Cingano belongs.
I have keenly noted with great concern that the Evurore Land Dispute’s Tribunal also heard case No. 404/09 involving the same parcel and same parties within a period of 3 weeks and delivering awards.
Surprisingly in their case No. 404/09 they said the land should revert back to the clan under the chairmanship of IRERI NDUMO and thereafter the same is divided among the Ngugi Clan members. In this one it actually transferred the lands to NAMU MURIGO. I am surprised the Principal Magistrate Siakago did not take note of these double standards by the Tribunal and those who filed the matter before the Tribunal.
The Tribunal is formed under the Land Disputes Act No. 18/90 which confers jurisdiction to it. The jurisdiction to transfer title, cancel title deeds and even deal with determination of interest in land is not part of the Tribunal’s jurisdiction. See the case of THE MERU CENTRAL DISTRICT LAND DISPUTES TRIBUNAL, MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 51 OF 2005 BY JUSTICE KASANGO MARY.
The Evurore Land Disputes Tribunal went beyond its jurisdiction doing what was ultra vires the Act. It cannot be allowed to stand. I find for the Applicant and make the following orders.
1. This court calls back the decision of the Evurore Land Disputes Tribunal Case No. 320/2009 and read in court before the Principal Magistrate Siakago as LDT No. 11/09 and quashes that decision.
2. The Respondents are prohibited from executing the award in Tribunal Case No. 320/2009 and the decree in Siakago Principal Magistrate’ Court No. 11/2009.
3. There shall be no order as to costs.
DELIVERED, SIGNED AND DATED AT EMBU THIS 2nd DAY OF NOVEMBER 2011.
H. I. ONG’UDI
JUDGE