[2020] KEELC 889 (KLR)

[2020] KEELC 889 (KLR)

The court held that since the original land parcel Butsotso/Shikoti/4464 no longer exists, having been subdivided into new parcels, the previous orders made in relation to that parcel are unenforceable. The court found no error or omission in its prior rulings and determined that the applicants, having been...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEELC 889 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Chairman Land Disputes Tribunal Kakamega Municipality; Interested Party: Alfred N. Andati; Interested Party: Esther B.U. Muhonja alias Rosemary Esther Ondisa Muhonja; Interested Party: Stanley M. Lijinga; Interested Party: Elijah’s Four Sons; Interested Party: Amina Abdi Perizer; Interested Party: John Otiede Masimba; Ex Parte Applicant: James Sakwa Mukolwe
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review 9 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Ruling on Applications for Review and Enforcement of Previous Court Orders
Outcome
applications dismissed
Judges
NA Matheka
Legal Topics
Review of Court Orders, Enforcement of Judgments, Land Title Subdivision, Implementation of Court Orders
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Review of Court Orders Enforcement of Judgments Land Title Subdivision Implementation of Court Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Chairman Land Disputes Tribunal Kakamega Municipality

Respondent

Alfred N. Andati

Interested Party

Esther B.U. Muhonja alias Rosemary Esther Ondisa Muhonja

Interested Party

Stanley M. Lijinga

Interested Party

Elijah’s Four Sons

Interested Party

Amina Abdi Perizer

Interested Party

John Otiede Masimba

Interested Party

James Sakwa Mukolwe

Ex Parte Applicant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Ruling on Applications for Review and Enforcement of Previous Court Orders

  1. 1 Whether the court should review its previous rulings to substitute the original land title number with the new subdivided title number.
  2. 2 Whether the applicants are entitled to enforcement of previous court orders in light of the changed status of the suit property.
  3. 3 Whether the court orders can be implemented when the original land parcel no longer exists.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that since the original land parcel Butsotso/Shikoti/4464 no longer exists, having been subdivided into new parcels, the previous orders made in relation to that parcel are unenforceable. The court found no error or omission in its prior rulings and determined that the applicants, having been indolent, must present a fresh matter if they wish to enforce their rights over the new parcels. The applications for review and enforcement were therefore dismissed as lacking merit, as the subject matter of the orders had fundamentally changed and the court could not grant relief based on non-existent property.

Court Disposition

applications dismissed

Orders

  • Both applications dated 29th November 2019 and 18th February 2020 are dismissed.
  • No orders as to costs.