[2006] KEHC 1806 (KLR)

[2006] KEHC 1806 (KLR)

The court found that the cancellation of the applicant's liquor licence by the Chairman Licensing Court was unlawful because it was done in breach of section 12 of the Liquor Licensing Act and the principles of natural justice. The applicant was not served with any objection, nor was he given an opportunity to be...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2006] KEHC 1806 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Chairman Licensing Court; Respondent: The Attorney General; Applicant: Peter Koech
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Eldoret
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Application 74 of 2006
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Judgment
Outcome
Application allowed. Prayers (a), (b), and (c) of the amended application granted. Costs awarded to the applicant.
Judges
AI Tullu
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Natural Justice, Licensing Procedure
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Civil Procedure Judicial Review Natural Justice Licensing Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Chairman Licensing Court

Respondent

The Attorney General

Respondent

Peter Koech

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the cancellation of the applicant's liquor licence was lawful.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant was denied the right to be heard as required by law.
  3. 3 Whether the principles of natural justice were breached by the respondent.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the cancellation of the applicant's liquor licence by the Chairman Licensing Court was unlawful because it was done in breach of section 12 of the Liquor Licensing Act and the principles of natural justice. The applicant was not served with any objection, nor was he given an opportunity to be heard before the cancellation. The law requires that before such a cancellation, the affected party must be notified and given at least seven days to respond. The failure to follow this statutory and procedural requirement rendered the cancellation null and void. The court emphasized that due process must be followed in administrative actions affecting rights and interests.

Court Disposition

Application allowed. Prayers (a), (b), and (c) of the amended application granted. Costs awarded to the applicant.

Orders

  • Prayers (a), (b), and (c) of the application amended on 8th June, 2006 are granted.
  • The 1st respondent shall pay the applicant's costs.