[2013] KEHC 5895 (KLR)
The court found that the Ndivisi Land Disputes Tribunal exceeded its statutory jurisdiction by making an award that effectively ordered the cancellation of registered land titles and determined issues of succession. Such matters fall exclusively within the jurisdiction of the High Court. The tribunal's award, having...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] KEHC 5895 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Chairman Ndivisi Land Disputes Tribunal; Applicant: Martin Juma; Applicant: Jack Wanyama Mangoli; Interested Party: Trudea Naswa
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Bungoma
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Miscellaneous 7 of 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- application allowed in part
- Judges
- AA Omollo
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Tribunal Jurisdiction, Succession Disputes, Title Cancellation
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Chairman Ndivisi Land Disputes Tribunal
Respondent
Martin Juma
Applicant
Jack Wanyama Mangoli
Applicant
Trudea Naswa
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Ndivisi Land Disputes Tribunal had jurisdiction to determine matters relating to succession and title to land.
- 2 Whether the tribunal's award and the subsequent adoption by the magistrate's court were lawful and within statutory powers.
- 3 Whether the orders of the tribunal should be quashed for exceeding jurisdiction.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Ndivisi Land Disputes Tribunal exceeded its statutory jurisdiction by making an award that effectively ordered the cancellation of registered land titles and determined issues of succession. Such matters fall exclusively within the jurisdiction of the High Court. The tribunal's award, having been adopted by the magistrate's court, was therefore unlawful and void. The court quashed the tribunal's award and the adoption order, holding that the interested party's claim should have been pursued through a succession cause in the High Court, not before the tribunal. The court also noted that the prayer for prohibition was overtaken by events as the tribunal had been...
Court Disposition
application allowed in part
Orders
- The award of the Ndivisi Land Disputes Tribunal in case no. 3 of 2009 and the judgment and orders of the SRMC Webuye in Misc. application no. 16 of 2009 dated 4th September 2009 are quashed.
- Each party shall bear their own costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
37 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT BUNGOMA
MISC. APPLICATION NO. 7 OF 2010.
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY MARTIN JUMA AND JACK WANYAMA MANGOLI
FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW
AND
IN THE MATTER OF THE LAND DISPUTES TRIBUNAL ARBITRATION CASE NO. 3 0F 2009 AND WEBUYE SENIOR RESIDENTS MAGISTRATES COURT LAND CASE NO. 16 OF 2009
AND ADOPTION ORDER THEREIN ISSUES ON 4TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2009
AND
IN THE MATTER OF THE LAND REFORM ACT CHAPTER 26 LAWS OF KENYA
BETWEEN
REPUBLIC …............................................................................................. APPLICANT
VERSUS
THE CHAIRMAN NDIVISI
LAND DISPUTES TRIBUNAL ….............................................................. RESPONDENT
MARTIN JUMA
JACK WANYAMA MANGOLI …..................................................... EXPARTE APPLICANT
TRUDEA NASWA......................................................................... INTERESTED PARTY
JUDGMENT
The exparte applicants by notice of motion dated 17th May 2012 sought orders;
That the decision of Ndivisi land Disputes tribunal case no. 3 of 2009 over L.R. No. Ndivisi/Makuselwa/1451 and 1634 and the judgment and orders of the SRMC Webuye in Misc. application no. 16 of 2009 dated 4th September 2009 be removed into this court, reviewed and quashed.
That Ndivisi division land disputes tribunal be prohibited from arbitrating a claim lodged by the complainant directly or indirectly over the same parcel of land again.
Costs of this application be provided for.
The applicant was granted leave to commence judicial review proceedings on 7th May 2012.
The proceedings before the Ndivisi Land Disputes tribunal reveal the complaint was about sharing the estate of deceased Mangoli Wachie. The interested party was the sister to the expartge applicants. The land in question was their father's. Their father had 5 wives and the interested\ party was from the first house as an only child.
From the verdict of the tribunal it seemed the land had been transferred to martin Juma's name from his father. The tribunal stated thus in their verdict;
“Mrs. Trudea Naswa Mukhevi the complainant has the right to get a share of two (2) acres of land from her father's land of 47 acres which is a share of her mother, this to come from the two numbers in MARTIN JUMA'S name i.e. ND/MK/1451 & 1634. ”
The exparte applicants submit this matter was beyond the jurisdiction of the Tribunal. Mr. omukunda submitted that the two parcels do not exist as the land ND/MK/816 is registered in the names of GILBERT WACHIE MANGOLI – deceased. However, this may not be true as the search referred to and annexed in the replying affidavit of the interested party clearly shows L.R. 816 was closed on subdivision on 19th March 2004 to give a new number 1449 – 1461.
Mr. Omukunda also submitted the tribunal had no business dealing with matters of succession.
The interested party on her part said her Father had given her two(2) acres and Martin has refused to give her the two acres. She said the exparte applicants had lied they would give her land.
It is unfortunate the exparte applicants have disinherited the interested party of her small share of two acres from her father's land. She ought to have filed her claim in the high court to establish her claim. The tribunal does not have capacity to make an order that results into cancellation of applicants titles. They exceeded the powers given to them by Section 3 (1) of the land Disputes tribunal Act.
Their award which was adopted by Webuye SRMCC No. 16 of 2009 on the 4th September 2009 is called into this court and is hereby quashed.
There is a second prayer seeking an order prohibiting the Ndivisi Land disputes tribunal from hearing this matter again. This is overtaken as the tribunal has since been disbanded.
I order that each party bear their own costs.
JUDGMENT DATED, DELIVERED AND SIGNED In open court this 12th day of June 2013.
A. OMOLLO
JUDGE