[2015] KEHC 2817 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution, having called four witnesses and presented circumstantial evidence, had established a prima facie case against the accused persons. The evidence, though circumstantial, was deemed sufficient at this stage to require the accused to be placed on their defence under Section 306(2)...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] KEHC 2817 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Charles Kipkorir Langat; Defendant: Daniel Kipngetich Bett; Defendant: Bernard Kibett Sigilai
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kericho
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 40 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Prima Facie Case at Close of Prosecution
- Outcome
- accused persons placed on their defence
- Judges
- HI Ong'udi
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Prima Facie Case, Circumstantial Evidence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Charles Kipkorir Langat
Defendant
Daniel Kipngetich Bett
Defendant
Bernard Kibett Sigilai
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Prima Facie Case at Close of Prosecution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused persons to warrant their being placed on their defence.
- 2 Whether the circumstantial evidence adduced is sufficient at this stage to require the accused to answer the charge of murder.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution, having called four witnesses and presented circumstantial evidence, had established a prima facie case against the accused persons. The evidence, though circumstantial, was deemed sufficient at this stage to require the accused to be placed on their defence under Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court did not make a finding on guilt but determined that the threshold for a prima facie case had been met, necessitating the accused to answer the charge of murder.
Court Disposition
accused persons placed on their defence
Orders
- The accused persons are placed on their defence under Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KERICHO
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 40 OF 2012
REPUBLIC...................................................................PROSECUTOR
VERSUS
CHARLES KIPKORIR LANGAT...................................1ST ACCUSED
DANIEL KIPNGETICH BETT.......................................2ND ACCUSED
BERNARD KIBETT SIGILAI.........................................3RD ACCUSED
RULING
The three accused persons have been charged of Murder Contrary to Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code.
- Four (4) witnesses were called by the prosecution. The evidence adduced is circumstantial. I am satisfied that a prima facie case has been established by the prosecution.
- The accused are hereby placed on their defence under Section 306 (2) Criminal Procedure Code.
Dated and Signed this 18th day of September, 2015.
H.I. ONG'UDI
JUDGE
Delivered in open Court this 25th day of September 2015.
H.I. ONG'UDI
JUDGE.
In the Presence of:
Ms. Mwangi for state.
Mr. Mwita for Accused – Absent.
Kenei/Hillary – Court Assistants.
Interprates – English/Kiswahi.