[2019] KEHC 7056 (KLR)
The court found that, given the accused's youth at the time of the offence, his status as a first offender, the positive reports from the probation officer, community, and prison authorities, and his demonstrated efforts at rehabilitation, a custodial sentence was not warranted. The court determined that a probation...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 7056 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Charles Ngothyo Ndile
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Makueni
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 71 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Law / Sentencing Ruling After Plea Bargain and Conviction
- Outcome
- Accused sentenced to three years' probation.
- Legal Topics
- Manslaughter, Plea Bargaining, Sentencing, Probation Orders
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Charles Ngothyo Ndile
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Law / Sentencing Ruling After Plea Bargain and Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused should be sentenced to a custodial or non-custodial sentence for manslaughter after a plea bargain and conviction.
- 2 What weight should be given to the accused's mitigation, age, first offender status, and probation officer's report.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that, given the accused's youth at the time of the offence, his status as a first offender, the positive reports from the probation officer, community, and prison authorities, and his demonstrated efforts at rehabilitation, a custodial sentence was not warranted. The court determined that a probation order would serve the interests of justice and rehabilitation better than imprisonment. The accused was therefore sentenced to three years' probation, with instructions to report to the Sub-County Probation Officer at Mukaa, and was warned of the consequences of breaching the probation order.
Court Disposition
Accused sentenced to three years' probation.
Orders
- The accused is sentenced to three years' probation.
- The accused shall report to the Sub-County Probation Officer at Mukaa for further instructions.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MAKUENI
HCCR. NO. 71 OF 2017
REPUBLIC...........................................................APPLICANT
-VERSUS-
CHARLES NGOTHYO NDILE....................RESPONDENT
RULING ON SENTENCE
1. Charles Ngothyo Ndile was initially charged with the offence of murder contrary to Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code.
2. Following a successful plea bargaining agreement, the charge was reduced to manslaughter contrary to Section 202 as read with Section 205 of the Penal Code. The accused pleaded guilty and was convicted of the same.
3. From the facts presented to the court it came to the court’s knowledge that the accused and deceased were first cousins. The deceased’s father and the deceased’s mother were brother and sister. They therefore share grandparents.
4. Upon conviction and strong mitigation by Mr. Hassan for the accused, and the fact that the accused was a first offender, the court called for a pre-sentence report which was filed by the County Probation Officer on 14th May, 2019. The said report is so detailed.
Both families, the administration, neighbours, his former head teacher at Mbiini Primary School; his school teacher at G.K Prison School among others were interviewed. All have positive reports about him.
5. The accused while in prison sat for his KCPE and scored 260 out of 500 marks in 2015. He was born on 30th July, 1996 and so was aged 18 ½ years at the time of commission of this offence. He is now aged 22 years, 10 months.
6. I have considered all the mitigation, the Probation Officer’s Report and the circumstances surrounding the commission of this offence. I have also taken into account the fact that the accused was first arraigned in court on 17th March, 2015 which is exactly four (4) years and two (2) months, ago.
7. I am in agreement with the County Probation Officer’s report that the accused requires appropriate guidance and counselling. I therefore sentence him to three (3) years’ probation. He will be reporting to the Sub-County Probation Officer at Mukaa for further instructions.
8. He is clearly informed of the consequences of failure to adhere to the guidelines by the Probation Officer, in respect to the Probation Order.
Orders accordingly.
DELIVERED, SIGNED AND DATED THIS 23RD DAY OF MAY, 2019 IN OPEN COURT AT MAKUENI.
...........................
H. I ONG’UDI
JUDGE