[2018] KEHC 690 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 690 (KLR)

The court found that the accused persons, acting jointly, unlawfully murdered the deceased. While acknowledging that they were first offenders, the court considered the aggravated nature of the offence, specifically that the accused took the law into their own hands and acted collectively. Balancing these factors,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 690 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Republic; Respondent: Charles Survey Manini; Respondent: Richard Ombui Manini; Respondent: Gilbert Makori Minyonga alias Museveni Onsando; Respondent: Joseph Mandela Manini alias Tom; Respondent: Samuel Kamwana Morema
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisii
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Appeal 96 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Sentencing
Outcome
conviction and custodial sentence imposed
Legal Topics
Murder, Sentencing, Joint Offenders
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Murder Sentencing Joint Offenders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Appellant

Charles Survey Manini

Respondent

Richard Ombui Manini

Respondent

Gilbert Makori Minyonga alias Museveni Onsando

Respondent

Joseph Mandela Manini alias Tom

Respondent

Samuel Kamwana Morema

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Sentencing

  1. 1 Whether the accused persons are guilty of the offence of murder.
  2. 2 What is the appropriate sentence for first offenders convicted of murder aggravated by acting jointly.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the accused persons, acting jointly, unlawfully murdered the deceased. While acknowledging that they were first offenders, the court considered the aggravated nature of the offence, specifically that the accused took the law into their own hands and acted collectively. Balancing these factors, the court determined that a custodial sentence of twenty-five years imprisonment for each accused was appropriate to reflect both the seriousness of the offence and the mitigating circumstance of being first offenders.

Court Disposition

conviction and custodial sentence imposed

Orders

  • Each accused is sentenced to twenty-five (25) years imprisonment.
  • Right of appeal explained to the accused.