[2023] KEHC 19036 (KLR)
The court, after considering the accused's mitigation and the circumstances of the case, determined that a custodial sentence was appropriate. In compliance with Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, the court deducted the six years the accused spent in remand custody from the total sentence of ten years'...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEHC 19036 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Kahindi Katana Charo
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 16 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Sentencing Order
- Outcome
- Accused sentenced to 10 years imprisonment less 6 years spent in remand custody.
- Judges
- A. Ong’injo
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Remand Custody Deduction
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Kahindi Katana Charo
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Sentencing Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the period spent in remand custody should be deducted from the sentence imposed on the accused.
- 2 What is the appropriate sentence for the accused considering mitigation and circumstances of the case.
Ratio Decidendi
The court, after considering the accused's mitigation and the circumstances of the case, determined that a custodial sentence was appropriate. In compliance with Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, the court deducted the six years the accused spent in remand custody from the total sentence of ten years' imprisonment, resulting in a net custodial sentence of four years. The court thereby ensured that the accused was not punished twice for the period already served while awaiting trial.
Court Disposition
Accused sentenced to 10 years imprisonment less 6 years spent in remand custody.
Orders
- The accused is sentenced to 10 years imprisonment less 6 years spent in remand custody between May 8, 2014 and May 26, 2020.
- Right of appeal explained; 14 days from the date of the order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
17 paragraphs
Republic v Charo (Criminal Case 16 of 2014) [2023] KEHC 19036 (KLR) (13 June 2023) (Order)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 19036 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Mombasa
Criminal Case 16 of 2014
A. Ong’injo, J
June 13, 2023
Between
Republic
Prosecutor
and
Kahindi Katana Charo
Accused
Order
1. Having considered the accused person’s mitigation and the circumstances of the case, this court sentences the accused to 10 years imprisonment less 6 years spent in remand custody between May 8, 2014 to May 26, 2020 when released on bond.
2. Right of Appeal – 14 days from today’s date explained.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED IN OPEN COURT THIS 13TH DAY OF JUNE 2023HON. LADY JUSTICE A. ONG’INJOJUDGEIn the presence of:-Ogwel - Court assistantMr. Ngiri Prosecutor for StateMr. Ochieng Advocate for AccusedAccused – Present in personHon. Lady Justice A. Ong’injo J13/06/2023