[2025] KEHC 5230 (KLR)

[2025] KEHC 5230 (KLR)

The High Court found that the trial magistrate failed to properly analyze the evidence and instead focused on irrelevant issues such as alleged employment disputes and personal relationships. The appellate court held that the prosecution's evidence, particularly the corroborated testimony of the complainant and PW2, established that the respondent accused the complainant of being a witch. The respondent did not effectively deny the accusation during examination-in-chief and cross-examination, only making a denial in re-examination. The defence witnesses did not provide evidence to dislodge the prosecution's case. The court concluded that the trial magistrate's reasoning was flawed and...

Citation
[2025] KEHC 5230 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Republic; Respondent: Alexander Peni Chengo
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Malindi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Judgment Date
25 April 2025
Case Number
Criminal Appeal E038 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal_allowed_conviction_entered
Judges
M Thande
Legal Topics
Witchcraft Offences, Criminal Appeals, Standard of Proof, Evaluation of Evidence
Source Language
English
Criminal Law Witchcraft Offences Criminal Appeals Standard of Proof Evaluation of Evidence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Appellant

Alexander Peni Chengo

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the prosecution proved the offence of accusing another of being a witch under Section 6 of the Witchcraft Act to the required standard.
  2. 2 Whether the trial magistrate erred by acquitting the respondent on extraneous matters not central to the charge.
  3. 3 Whether the trial court failed to properly analyse and evaluate the evidence presented by both parties.

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court found that the trial magistrate failed to properly analyze the evidence and instead focused on irrelevant issues such as alleged employment disputes and personal relationships. The appellate court held that the prosecution's evidence, particularly the corroborated testimony of the complainant and PW2, established that the respondent accused the complainant of being a witch. The respondent did not effectively deny the accusation during examination-in-chief and cross-examination, only making a denial in re-examination. The defence witnesses did not provide evidence to dislodge the prosecution's case. The court concluded that the trial magistrate's reasoning was flawed and...

Court Disposition

appeal_allowed_conviction_entered

Orders

  • The appeal is allowed.
  • The acquittal of the respondent is quashed.