[2023] KEHC 2541 (KLR)
The court held that bail is a constitutional right under Article 49(1)(h) of the Constitution, and that the prosecution's lack of opposition to the application indicated the absence of compelling reasons to deny bail. The court considered the pre-bail report, which recommended release and noted the accused's strong...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEHC 2541 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Sheila Chepkoech
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Bomet
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case E027 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Bail Application Pending Trial
- Outcome
- Application for bail granted.
- Judges
- RL Korir
- Legal Topics
- Bail Application, Presumption of Innocence, Compelling Reasons, Pretrial Release
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Sheila Chepkoech
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Bail Application Pending Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused is entitled to bail pending trial under Article 49(1)(h) of the Constitution.
- 2 Whether there exist compelling reasons to deny the accused bail.
- 3 What are the appropriate terms for the grant of bail or bond.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that bail is a constitutional right under Article 49(1)(h) of the Constitution, and that the prosecution's lack of opposition to the application indicated the absence of compelling reasons to deny bail. The court considered the pre-bail report, which recommended release and noted the accused's strong family support and willingness of her mother to stand surety. The court found no factors justifying pretrial detention and therefore granted the accused bail on reasonable terms, including a personal bond and surety, with conditions to attend court and not impede the trial.
Court Disposition
Application for bail granted.
Orders
- The accused shall execute a personal bond of KES 300,000 and provide one surety of similar amount.
- The accused shall attend court and not impede her trial in any way.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
Republic v Chepkoech (Criminal Case E027 of 2022) [2023] KEHC 2541 (KLR) (29 March 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 2541 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Bomet
Criminal Case E027 of 2022
RL Korir, J
March 29, 2023
Between
Republic
Prosecution
and
Sheila Chepkoech
Accused
Ruling
1. The Accused was charged with the offence of murder contrary to section 203 of the Penal Code. On November 21, 2022, the Accused pleaded not guilty to the charge. The Accused thereafter made an application to be released on bond pending trial.
2. Bail/bond is a constitutional right provided under Article 49(1) (h) of the Constitution. The provision is clear that, unless there is some compelling reason, an Accused person ought to be released on bail, as a matter of right. It provides that:-“An arrested person has the right - to be released on bond or bail on reasonable conditions pending a charge or trial unless there are compelling reasons not to be released.”
3. In the Bail and Bond Policy Guidelinesat Paragraph 3. 1 (a), it is recommended that:-………Every accused person shall be presumed innocent (Article 50(2) of the Constitution).This is the primary rationale for the requirement of the Constitution that an arrested person has the right to be released on bail or bond.The presumption of innocence dictates that accused persons should be released on bail or bond whenever possible. The presumption of innocence also means that pretrial detention should not constitute punishment, and the fact that accused persons are not convicts should be reflected in their treatment and management. For example, accused persons should not be subject to the same rules and regulations as convicts…….
4. Section 123A of the Criminal Procedure Code, Chapter 75 of the Laws of Kenya, stipulates that:-(1)Subject to Article 49(1)(h) of the Constitution and notwithstanding section 123, in making a decision on bail and bond, the Court shall have regard to all the relevant circumstances and in particular—(a)the nature or seriousness of the offence;(b)the character, antecedents, associations and community ties of the accused person;(c)the defendant's record in respect of the fulfilment of obligations under previous grants of bail; and;(d)the strength of the evidence of his having committed the offence;(2)A person who is arrested or charged with any offence shall be granted bail unless the court is satisfied that the person—(a)has previously been granted bail and has failed to surrender to custody and that if released on bail (whether or not subject to conditions) it is likely that he would fail to surrender to custody;(b)should be kept in custody for his own protection.
5. The present application is not opposed by the prosecution. This clearly implies that there is no compelling reason to warrant denial of bond. The only remaining issue therefore is the determination of the terms upon which bond or bail can be granted.
6. I have considered a Pre-bail Report filed on December 21, 2022. The Report indicates that the Accused is a mother of two with the last born, Rian Kiprotich being the victim. Further, that she has a strong family support and that the community had embraced the court process and were eager to establish the truth. The Report recommends her release on bail.
7. It is salient to note that the Report indicated that the Accused’s mother, Edna Chepngeno was ready to stand surety for the Accused.
8. In the end, I find the Application merited.
9. The Accused is granted bond on the following terms:-(i)She shall execute a personal bond of 300,000 and provide one surety of similar amount.(ii)She shall attend court and not impede her trial in any way.
10. Orders accordingly.
RULING DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT BOMET THIS 29TH DAY OF MARCH, 2023. .........................R LAGAT-KORIRJUDGERuling delivered in the presence of Mr Njeru for the State, Mr Barusei for the Accused, Siele and Susan (Court Assistant)