[2023] KEHC 3809 (KLR)
The court considered the plea bargain, the accused's status as a first offender, his remorse, the period of seven years already spent in remand, and the lack of reconciliation between the families. The probation report recommended against a non-custodial sentence due to the absence of reconciliation, but the court...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEHC 3809 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Rodgers Kipsang Cherutich
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kabarnet
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 67 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Sentencing Ruling After Plea Bargain and Conviction
- Outcome
- Accused sentenced to three years' probation for manslaughter.
- Judges
- RB Ngetich
- Legal Topics
- Manslaughter, Plea Bargain, Sentencing Guidelines, Mitigation, Probation, First Offender
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Rodgers Kipsang Cherutich
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Sentencing Ruling After Plea Bargain and Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused should be sentenced to a custodial or non-custodial sentence for manslaughter.
- 2 What weight should be given to the accused's mitigation, remorse, and time already served in remand.
- 3 Whether the lack of reconciliation between the families affects the appropriateness of a non-custodial sentence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court considered the plea bargain, the accused's status as a first offender, his remorse, the period of seven years already spent in remand, and the lack of reconciliation between the families. The probation report recommended against a non-custodial sentence due to the absence of reconciliation, but the court exercised its discretion, noting the accused's reformation, lack of prior record, and the significant time already served. The court found these factors sufficient to justify a non-custodial sentence and imposed a three-year probation order instead of imprisonment.
Court Disposition
Accused sentenced to three years' probation for manslaughter.
Orders
- Accused to serve three years' probation sentence.
- Right of appeal within 14 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
31 paragraphs
Republic v Cherutich (Criminal Case 67 of 2017) [2023] KEHC 3809 (KLR) (27 April 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 3809 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kabarnet
Criminal Case 67 of 2017
RB Ngetich, J
April 27, 2023
Between
Republic
Prosecution
and
Rodgers Kipsang Cherutich
Accused
Ruling
1. The accused Rodgers Kipsang Cherutich was charged with an offence of murder contrary to section 203 as read together with section 204 of thePenal Code. The particulars of the charge being that the accused on the 18th day of June,2016 at Logiri village in Mogotio Sub- County within Baringo county, unlawfully killed Toyoi Kipkoech Selembu.
2. The accused denied the charge and the case proceeded for hearing with prosecution availing to testify in support of their case.
3. On 18th August 2019, the defence counsel informed court that the accused was desirous in pursuing plea bargain. On 20th march 2023 Parties executed plea bargain agreement to have the charge reduced to manslaughter upon which the charge and particulars of the offence of manslaughter were read over and explained to the accused who pleaded guilty and was convicted under section 202 as read with section 205 of the Penal code.
4. Brief facts of the case are that on the 17th and 18th day of June 2016, at around 9p.m, the accused went to his mother’s house and asked for whereabout of his siblings
5. Upon conviction of the accused the state counsel informed the court that they have not found any prior records of the accused and urged the court to treat him as a first offender.
6. The accused mitigated through his Advocate Mr. Kipkulei who submitted that that the accused is 42 years old, a first born in a family of six siblings; he is not married and does not have a child. That he is a partial orphan having lost his father in the year 2005.
7. Counsel submitted that the accused is remorseful; he regrets having committed the offence and he has sought forgiveness with the family of the deceased who have agreed to forgive him.
8. Further that the accused has undergone bible training; that he has reformed and he is now a Christian. He wishes to start a family and build the nation. He is a first offender. Counsel urged the court to impose that the accused has been in custody since June, 2016 and consider a non-custodial sentence
9. On the 20th March, 2023 the Court made an order for a pre-bail report to be prepared by the probation officer before making any determination on the matter.
10. From the report, the offender’s family has not initiated any reconciliation process with the victim’s family which in view of the probation officer made many of those interviewed shy away from giving any meaningful comment. The officer recommends that a non-custodial sentence may not be appropriate as of now since the offender’s family have not taken the first initiative as it has always been with the Kalenjin traditional rites as regards manslaughter/murder cases; and urged this court to exercise its discretion in sentencing the offender.
11. Section 205 of the Penal code provides life imprisonment as the punishment for manslaughter is. I however take note of the sentencing guidelines.
12. I have considered mitigating factors through counsel for the accused. I note from the probation report that the accused has no clear recollection of how he committee that offence. From the report he indicated that he was not of right mental status but he recalls struggling over a panga with the victim. I also note from the report that no reconciliation has been initiated as the deceased’s only son who was following up the matter passed on.
13. From the probation officers report, prior to his arrest, the accused was known to abuse alcohol and bhang from early age and at the time of committing of the offence, he was drunk and became violent and due to heavy drinking, he experiences hallucinations which made him follow up the victim and attacked him
14. I have considered the circumstances surrounding this case as presented to the court by way of facts, mitigation and presentence report. I also take note of the period served by the accused in remand being from year 2016 a period of 7 years and I am inclined to impose a non-custodial sentence
Final Orders: 1. Accused to serve 3 years’ probation sentence
2. Right of appeal 14 days.
RULING DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED VIRTUALLY AT KABARNET THIS 27TH DAY OF APRIL 2023. RACHEL NGETICHJUDGEIn the presence of:Mr. Sitienei - Court Assistant.Mr. Kipkulei for accused.