[2025] KEHC 2675 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution had adduced sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case against the accused. As a result, the accused is required to be put on his defence in accordance with Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court explained the three ways in which the accused may make...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KEHC 2675 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Samuel Chiding
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kapenguria
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case E001 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Prima Facie Case at Close of Prosecution
- Outcome
- Accused found to have a case to answer and put on his defence.
- Judges
- RPV Wendoh
- Legal Topics
- Prima Facie Case, Criminal Trial Procedure, Defence Options
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Samuel Chiding
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Prima Facie Case at Close of Prosecution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case requiring the accused to be put on his defence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution had adduced sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case against the accused. As a result, the accused is required to be put on his defence in accordance with Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court explained the three ways in which the accused may make his defence, thereby complying with the procedural requirements at this stage of a criminal trial.
Court Disposition
Accused found to have a case to answer and put on his defence.
Orders
- The accused is found to have a case to answer and is put on his defence.
- The three ways of making a defence are explained to the accused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
16 paragraphs
Republic v Chiding (Criminal Case E001 of 2022) [2025] KEHC 2675 (KLR) (6 March 2025) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 2675 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kapenguria
Criminal Case E001 of 2022
RPV Wendoh, J
March 6, 2025
Between
Republic
Prosecutor
and
Samuel Chiding
Accused
Ruling
1. After hearing the prosecution evidence, this court is satisfied that the prosecution has made out a prima facie case for the accused to answer. The three ways of making a defence are explained to the accused.
DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT KAPENGURIA THIS 6TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025R. WENDOH.JUDGE.Ruling delivered in Open Court in the presence of; -Mr. Suter for the StateMs. Sugut for AccusedAccused – presentJuma/Hellen - Court Assistants