[2024] KEELRC 2571 (KLR)

[2024] KEELRC 2571 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had obtained a certificate of costs and a judgment against the County Government of Kisumu, and that the respondents, as the officers responsible for the county's finances, had a statutory duty to settle the debt. The respondents were duly served but failed to respond or...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEELRC 2571 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Chief Finance Officer, County Government Of Kisumu; Respondent: Executive Member of Finance, County Government Of Kisumu; Respondent: County Government Of Kisumu; Applicant: Otieno, Yogo, Ojuro & Co Advocates
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review E020 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Mandamus
Outcome
Application granted as prayed; order of mandamus issued.
Judges
JK Gakeri
Legal Topics
Judicial Review Mandamus, Enforcement of Costs, Public Officer Duties, County Government Liability
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Employment and Labour Judicial Review Mandamus Enforcement of Costs Public Officer Duties County Government Liability

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Chief Finance Officer, County Government Of Kisumu

Respondent

Executive Member of Finance, County Government Of Kisumu

Respondent

County Government Of Kisumu

Respondent

Otieno, Yogo, Ojuro & Co Advocates

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Mandamus

  1. 1 Whether an order of mandamus should issue to compel the respondents to pay the applicant the certified costs and interest as decreed by the court.
  2. 2 Whether the respondents, as public officers, are under a legal obligation to settle the debts of the County Government of Kisumu.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant is entitled to costs of the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had obtained a certificate of costs and a judgment against the County Government of Kisumu, and that the respondents, as the officers responsible for the county's finances, had a statutory duty to settle the debt. The respondents were duly served but failed to respond or participate in the proceedings, despite being given adequate opportunity. The court held that mandamus was the appropriate remedy to compel payment, as the applicant had no other means of enforcing the judgment due to statutory protections against execution against county governments. The application was therefore granted as unopposed, and the orders sought were issued.

Court Disposition

Application granted as prayed; order of mandamus issued.

Orders

  • An order of mandamus is issued compelling the Chief Finance Officer, Executive Member for Finance, and County Government of Kisumu to pay the applicant Kshs.411,988.00 together with interest at 14% per annum from 21st November, 2023 until full payment and interest on costs from 15th February, 2024.
  • The costs of the application are awarded to the applicant.