[2021] KEHC 7967 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 7967 (KLR)

The court held that while the applicant had annexed correspondence regarding the decretal sum, it had not provided evidence of compliance with the Government Proceedings Act, specifically the issuance and service of a Certificate of Order Against the Government. This omission is material, as such compliance is a...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 7967 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: NK Brothers Ltd; Respondent: Chief Registrar of the Judiciary; Respondent: Cabinet Secretary, National Treasury; Respondent: Principal Secretary, National Treasury; Respondent: Attorney General
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review Miscellaneous Application E1147 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Leave to Apply for Order of Mandamus
Outcome
Directions issued for inter partes hearing; no final determination on leave or mandamus at this stage.
Judges
P Nyamweya
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Mandamus, Government Liability, Enforcement of Arbitral Awards
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Administrative Law Judicial Review Mandamus Government Liability Enforcement of Arbitral Awards

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

NK Brothers Ltd

Applicant

Chief Registrar of the Judiciary

Respondent

Cabinet Secretary, National Treasury

Respondent

Principal Secretary, National Treasury

Respondent

Attorney General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Leave to Apply for Order of Mandamus

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has established a prima facie case for leave to apply for an order of mandamus against the respondents.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant has complied with the Government Proceedings Act, specifically regarding the Certificate of Order Against the Government.
  3. 3 Whether the court should grant leave to commence judicial review proceedings in the circumstances.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that while the applicant had annexed correspondence regarding the decretal sum, it had not provided evidence of compliance with the Government Proceedings Act, specifically the issuance and service of a Certificate of Order Against the Government. This omission is material, as such compliance is a statutory prerequisite for enforcement of decrees against government entities. Consequently, the court determined that the respondents should be given an opportunity to respond to the application before any further orders are made. The matter was set down for inter partes hearing, and directions were issued regarding service, filing, and hearing modalities, particularly in light...

Court Disposition

Directions issued for inter partes hearing; no final determination on leave or mandamus at this stage.

Orders

  • The ex parte applicant to serve the respondents with the Chamber Summons, skeletal submissions, this ruling, and a mention notice within 21 days.
  • Respondents granted leave to file and serve responses and skeletal submissions within 21 days of service.