[2006] KEHC 1732 (KLR)

[2006] KEHC 1732 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant's challenge to the surcharge was merited because the decision to surcharge was based on a report that was never properly adopted by the society as required by law. Furthermore, the amendments to the Co-operative Societies Act, under which the surcharge was purportedly issued, did...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2006] KEHC 1732 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Commissioner for Co-operative Development; Applicant: Christopher Simiyu
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Bungoma
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 70 of 2006
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review Orders
Outcome
Application for leave granted in terms of prayers 1, 2, 3, and 4; costs in the cause.
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Certiorari, Mandamus, Prohibition, Natural Justice, Ultra Vires
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Civil Procedure Judicial Review Certiorari Mandamus Prohibition Natural Justice Ultra Vires

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Commissioner for Co-operative Development

Respondent

Christopher Simiyu

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review Orders

  1. 1 Whether the respondent's decision to surcharge the applicant was lawful and procedurally proper.
  2. 2 Whether the surcharge was based on a validly adopted report as required by law.
  3. 3 Whether the amendments to the Co-operative Societies Act could be applied retrospectively to the applicant's case.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant's challenge to the surcharge was merited because the decision to surcharge was based on a report that was never properly adopted by the society as required by law. Furthermore, the amendments to the Co-operative Societies Act, under which the surcharge was purportedly issued, did not have retrospective effect and could not be applied to actions or reports predating their commencement. The respondent's actions were therefore ultra vires and in breach of the rules of natural justice. The application was made within the statutory period, and the applicant was entitled to leave to apply for judicial review orders of certiorari, prohibition, and mandamus,...

Court Disposition

Application for leave granted in terms of prayers 1, 2, 3, and 4; costs in the cause.

Orders

  • Leave granted to apply for orders of certiorari to quash the respondent's decision to surcharge the applicant Ksh.342,404 as communicated by letter dated 11th December 2005 and notice dated 6th December 2005.
  • Leave granted to apply for orders of prohibition restraining the respondent from enforcing the surcharge orders against the applicant.