[2017] KEHC 6183 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 6183 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant, as the legal representative of the estate of the deceased, had obtained a valid judgment and decree in Machakos CMCC No. 484 of 2008 against the respondents, and had followed all requisite legal procedures, including obtaining a certificate of order against the government and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEHC 6183 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Commissioner of Police; Respondent: Hon. Attorney General of the Republic of Kenya; Respondent: James Njogu Maina; Respondent: Senior Principal Magistrate’s Court at Machakos; Applicant: Paul Makau (suing as legal representative of the estate of Kimanzi Paul, deceased)
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Machakos
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application 294 of 2010
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Amended Notice of Motion for Order of Mandamus
Outcome
application granted
Judges
BC Koech
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Mandamus, Government Liability, Enforcement of Judgments
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Tort Law Judicial Review Mandamus Government Liability Enforcement of Judgments

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Commissioner of Police

Respondent

Hon. Attorney General of the Republic of Kenya

Respondent

James Njogu Maina

Respondent

Senior Principal Magistrate’s Court at Machakos

Respondent

Paul Makau (suing as legal representative of the estate of Kimanzi Paul, deceased)

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Amended Notice of Motion for Order of Mandamus

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to an order of mandamus to compel the respondents to pay the decretal sum awarded in Machakos CMCC No. 484 of 2008.
  2. 2 Whether the respondents have failed or refused to satisfy the judgment and decree issued against them.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant followed the requisite legal procedure for seeking judicial review orders against the government.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant, as the legal representative of the estate of the deceased, had obtained a valid judgment and decree in Machakos CMCC No. 484 of 2008 against the respondents, and had followed all requisite legal procedures, including obtaining a certificate of order against the government and serving the Attorney General with a demand for payment. The respondents failed to settle the judgment debt and did not oppose the judicial review application. The court held that the applicant had established a clear legal right to the relief sought and that an order of mandamus was appropriate to compel the respondents to pay the decretal sum, accrued interest at 12% per annum...

Court Disposition

application granted

Orders

  • An order of mandamus is issued compelling the respondents to pay the applicant Kshs. 200,000 together with interest at 12% per annum from 22nd June, 2010 until payment in full.
  • The respondents shall pay the applicant costs of Kshs. 30,250.