[2017] KEHC 6207 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 6207 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant, as the legal representative of the estate of the deceased, had obtained a valid judgment and decree in Machakos CMCC No. 483 of 2008 against the respondents, followed by a certificate of order against the government. The applicant complied with all procedural requirements for...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEHC 6207 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Commissioner of Police; Respondent: Hon. Attorney General of the Republic of Kenya; Respondent: James Njogu Maina; Respondent: Senior Principal Magistrate’s Court at Machakos; Applicant: Paul Makau (suing as the legal representative of the estate of Lilian Mawia Paul, deceased)
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Machakos
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application 292 of 2010
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Amended Notice of Motion for Order of Mandamus
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
BC Koech
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Mandamus, Enforcement of Judgments, Government Liability
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Administrative Law Judicial Review Mandamus Enforcement of Judgments Government Liability

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Commissioner of Police

Respondent

Hon. Attorney General of the Republic of Kenya

Respondent

James Njogu Maina

Respondent

Senior Principal Magistrate’s Court at Machakos

Respondent

Paul Makau (suing as the legal representative of the estate of Lilian Mawia Paul, deceased)

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Amended Notice of Motion for Order of Mandamus

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to an order of mandamus to compel the respondents to pay the decretal sum awarded in Machakos CMCC No. 483 of 2008.
  2. 2 Whether the respondents have failed or refused to satisfy the judgment and decree issued against them.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant followed the requisite procedure for judicial review against the government.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant, as the legal representative of the estate of the deceased, had obtained a valid judgment and decree in Machakos CMCC No. 483 of 2008 against the respondents, followed by a certificate of order against the government. The applicant complied with all procedural requirements for seeking judicial review, including obtaining leave and filing the substantive application within the prescribed period. The respondents, despite being served with demand letters and the application, failed to settle the judgment or oppose the proceedings. The court held that the applicant had established a clear right to the relief sought, and that an order of mandamus was...

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • An order of mandamus is issued compelling the respondents to pay the applicant Kshs. 150,000 together with interest at 12% per annum from 22nd June, 2010.
  • The respondents shall also pay costs of Kshs. 30,725 to the applicant.