[2015] KEHC 3838 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 3838 (KLR)

The High Court determined that it lacked jurisdiction to hear and determine the application because the subject matter involved use, occupation, and title to land. Pursuant to Article 162(2)(b) of the Constitution, such matters are reserved for the Environment and Land Court. The court therefore directed that the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEHC 3838 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Respondent: County Council of Vihiga; Interested Party: Ibrahim Assanka Muloma; Ex Parte Applicant: Evans Muyesu Lumwaji
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Application 37 of 2010
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Directions on Jurisdiction Prior to Substantive Hearing
Outcome
Transferred to the Environment and Land Court for want of jurisdiction.
Judges
AC Mrima
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction of High Court, Transfer to Environment and Land Court, Title to Land, Use and Occupation of Land
Source Language
en
Land and Property Jurisdiction of High Court Transfer to Environment and Land Court Title to Land Use and Occupation of Land

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

County Council of Vihiga

Respondent

Ibrahim Assanka Muloma

Interested Party

Evans Muyesu Lumwaji

Ex Parte Applicant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Directions on Jurisdiction Prior to Substantive Hearing

  1. 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to determine matters relating to use, occupation, and title to land under Article 162(2)(b) of the Constitution.
  2. 2 Whether the matter should be transferred to the Environment and Land Court.

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court determined that it lacked jurisdiction to hear and determine the application because the subject matter involved use, occupation, and title to land. Pursuant to Article 162(2)(b) of the Constitution, such matters are reserved for the Environment and Land Court. The court therefore directed that the parties appear before the Environment and Land Court for further proceedings, apologizing for any delay caused by the transfer.

Court Disposition

Transferred to the Environment and Land Court for want of jurisdiction.

Orders

  • Parties to appear before the Environment and Land Court on a date to be taken at the Registry.
  • Matter transferred to the Environment and Land Court.