Republic v County Executive Committee Member, Finance and Economic Planning & 3 others; Maliki & another (Ex parte Applicants) (Suing as the Administraors of the Estate of the Late Livingstone Kirigha Mwadime) (Judicial Review Application E003 of 2026) [2026] KEHC 4701 (KLR) (14 April 2026) (Ruling)

Republic v County Executive Committee Member, Finance and Economic Planning & 3 others; Maliki & another (Ex parte Applicants) (Suing as the Administraors of the Estate of the Late Livingstone Kirigha Mwadime) (Judicial Review Application E003 of 2026) [2026] KEHC 4701 (KLR) (14 April 2026) (Ruling)

Application for mandamus allowed as prayed due to lack of opposition; Respondents required to pay decretal sum as per consent order.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] KEHC 4701 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; 1st Respondent: County Executive Committee Member, Finance and Economic Planning; 2nd Respondent: County Chief Officer Finance and Economic Planning; 3rd Respondent: County Secretary; 4th Respondent: County Government of Taita Taveta; Ex Parte Applicant: Aisha Mlisho Maliki; Ex Parte Applicant: Brighton Mwanyama Kirigha
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review Application E003 of 2026
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Ruling
Outcome
Application allowed as prayed with costs to the Applicant.
Legal Topics
Mandamus, County Government Liability, Enforcement of Consent Orders
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Administrative Law Mandamus County Government Liability Enforcement of Consent Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

County Executive Committee Member, Finance and Economic Planning

1st Respondent

County Chief Officer Finance and Economic Planning

2nd Respondent

County Secretary

3rd Respondent

County Government of Taita Taveta

4th Respondent

Aisha Mlisho Maliki

Ex Parte Applicant

Brighton Mwanyama Kirigha

Ex Parte Applicant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Application / Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the Respondents should be compelled by mandamus to pay the decretal sum as per the consent order

Ratio Decidendi

Application for mandamus allowed as prayed due to lack of opposition; Respondents required to pay decretal sum as per consent order.

Court Disposition

Application allowed as prayed with costs to the Applicant.

Orders

  • Summons to issue to Respondents to appear in court on 11th May 2026 to show cause why they should not be committed to civil jail for failure to pay the decretal sum