[2022] KEELRC 102 (KLR)
The court found that the Respondents had failed to comply with both the original court order of 11 March 2021 and the subsequent consent order requiring payment of Kshs 35,000,000/-. The explanation provided by the Chief Finance Officer, namely the rejection of supplementary budgets by the County Assembly, did not...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KEELRC 102 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Respondent: County Executive Committee Member, Finance, Migori County Government; Respondent: Chief Finance Officer, Migori County Government; Respondent: Governor, Migori County Government; Applicant: Kenya County Government Workers Union
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Civil Application 6 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Motion to Stay Execution of Warrant of Arrest
- Outcome
- Order staying the arrest of the Chief Finance Officer, Migori County Government, is vacated pending the merit hearing of the Respondents' Motion.
- Judges
- S Radido
- Legal Topics
- Contempt of Court, Enforcement of Court Orders, Public Service Remuneration
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
County Executive Committee Member, Finance, Migori County Government
Respondent
Chief Finance Officer, Migori County Government
Respondent
Governor, Migori County Government
Respondent
Kenya County Government Workers Union
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Motion to Stay Execution of Warrant of Arrest
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the warrant of arrest against the Chief Finance Officer, Migori County Government, should be stayed pending the hearing and determination of the Respondents' Motion.
- 2 Whether the Respondents have provided sufficient justification for non-compliance with the court order of 11 March 2021.
- 3 Whether the consent order for payment of Kshs 35,000,000/- was complied with.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Respondents had failed to comply with both the original court order of 11 March 2021 and the subsequent consent order requiring payment of Kshs 35,000,000/-. The explanation provided by the Chief Finance Officer, namely the rejection of supplementary budgets by the County Assembly, did not constitute a sufficient legal excuse for non-compliance. The stay of the warrant of arrest had been granted on the condition of payment, which was not fulfilled. Consequently, the court vacated the order staying the arrest of the Chief Finance Officer, Migori County Government, pending the merit hearing of the Respondents' Motion. The court emphasized the binding nature of court...
Court Disposition
Order staying the arrest of the Chief Finance Officer, Migori County Government, is vacated pending the merit hearing of the Respondents' Motion.
Orders
- The order staying the arrest of the Chief Finance Officer, Migori County Government, is hereby vacated.
- The matter shall proceed to a merit hearing of the Respondents' Motion filed on 22 March 2022.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
37 paragraphs
Republic v County Executive Committee Member,Finance, Migori County Government & 2 others; Kenya County Government Workers Union (Exparte) (Miscellaneous Civil Application 6 of 2018) [2022] KEELRC 102 (KLR) (15 June 2022) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2022] KEELRC 102 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu
Miscellaneous Civil Application 6 of 2018
S Radido, J
June 15, 2022
Between
Republic
Applicant
and
County Executive Committee Member,Finance, Migori County Government
1st Respondent
Chief Finance Officer, Migori County Government
2nd Respondent
Governor, Migori County Government
3rd Respondent
and
Kenya County Government Workers Union
Exparte
Ruling
1. On 16 March 2022, the Court found merit in a Notice to Show Cause seeking an order that the Chief Officer, Finance, County of Migori be arrested and committed to civil jail for failure to comply with an order of the Court issued on 11 March 2021.
2. The Court directed the Chief Officer, Finance, to appear in Court on 23 March 2022 for mitigation and sentencing.
3. However, on 22 March 2022, the Chief Officer, Finance filed a Motion under a certificate of urgency seeking orders:(1)…(2)Thatan order do issue suspending, lifting and or staying execution of warrant of arrest issued against the 2nd Respondent/applicant on 16th March 2022 pending the hearing and determination of the application.(3)Thatan order do issue suspending, lifting and or staying execution of warrant of arrest issued against the 2nd Respondent/applicant on 16th March 2022. (4)Thatcosts of the application be provided for.
4. The Court directed that the Motion be served ahead of the giving of directions on 23 March 2022.
5. When the parties appeared in Court, the Respondents advocate informed the Court that the person who had been occupying the office of Chief Officer, Finance had been redeployed and a new officer appointed. Counsel indicated that the Respondents were intent on complying with the orders of 11 March 2021.
6. The Court directed the parties to attempt a compromise to the application and the file was placed aside.
7. Later in the morning, the advocates informed the Court that they had reached a consensus that Kshs 35,000,000/- be paid within a defined timeframe.
8. The Court heard brief oral addresses from the parties and directed that the first instalment of Kshs 35,000,000/- be paid on or before 12 May 2022. The Court stayed the warrants.
9. When the Motion was placed before the Court on 12 May 2022, it turned out that the Respondents had not complied with the consent they had reached with the applicant Union. The Respondents offered the Chief Officer, Finance for examination under oath on why there had been no compliance.
10. Despite the applicant Union having not filed a formal response to the Motion by the Respondents, the Respondents offered the Chief Officer for questioning, and she was questioned by the parties.
11. The Chief Officer, Finance explained that the Respondents had not complied because the County Assembly had rejected the 2 supplementary budgets which had been placed before it for approval.
12. The Chief Officer, Finance further explained that the monies would be budgeted for in the 2022/2023 financial year.
13. The Court had stayed the warrants of arrest issued on 16 March 2022 on the condition that the Respondents make certain payments. The payments have not been made.
14. In the circumstances, the Court vacates the order staying the arrest of the Chief Officer, Finance, Migori, pending the merit hearing of the Respondents’ Motion filed in Court on 22 March 2022.
15. Costs in the cause.
DELIVERED THROUGH MICROSOFT TEAMS, DATED AND SIGNED IN KISUMU ON THIS 15TH DAY OF JUNE 2022. RADIDO STEPHEN, MCIARBJUDGEAppearancesFor applicant Otieno, Yogo, Ojuro & Co. AdvocatesFor Respondents Ngeri, Omiti & Bush Advocates, LLPCourt Assistant Chrispo Aura