[2024] KEHC 6929 (KLR)
The court found that the respondent's decision to close the applicant's business and refuse to issue licences was not defended or justified, as the respondent failed to file any response or submissions despite being served. In the absence of any rebuttal, and upon consideration of the applicant's affidavits and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 6929 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Respondent: County Government of Taita Taveta; Applicant: Juma Barsley Mwashimba t/a JV Hotel Mwatate
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Voi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Judicial Review E002 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Judicial Review Orders
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- GMA Dulu
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Certiorari, Mandamus, Prohibition Orders, Fair Administrative Action, Licensing Decisions
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
County Government of Taita Taveta
Respondent
Juma Barsley Mwashimba t/a JV Hotel Mwatate
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Judicial Review Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent's decision to close the applicant's business and refuse to issue licences was lawful and procedurally fair.
- 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to judicial review orders of certiorari, mandamus, and prohibition against the respondent.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the respondent's decision to close the applicant's business and refuse to issue licences was not defended or justified, as the respondent failed to file any response or submissions despite being served. In the absence of any rebuttal, and upon consideration of the applicant's affidavits and submissions, the court held that the applicant had established grounds for judicial review. The respondent's actions were found to be procedurally unfair and contrary to the requirements of fair administrative action under the Constitution and the Fair Administrative Actions Act. The court therefore granted the orders of certiorari to quash the impugned decision, mandamus to compel...
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- Order of certiorari issued to quash the respondent's decision of 12th March 2024 closing the applicant's business and refusing licences.
- Order of mandamus issued compelling the respondent to immediately open the applicant's business and issue relevant licences forthwith.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
Republic v County Government of Taita Taveta; Mwashimba t/a JV Hotel Mwatate (Exparte Applicant) (Judicial Review E002 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 6929 (KLR) (5 June 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 6929 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Voi
Judicial Review E002 of 2024
GMA Dulu, J
June 5, 2024
IN THE MATTER OF: APPLICATION BY JUMA BARSLEY MWASHIMBA FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW ORDERS OF CERTIORARI, PROHIBITION AND MANDAMUS AND IN THE MATTER OF: ORDER 53 RULE 1, 2, 3 AND 4 OF CIVIL PROCEDURE RULES AND ALL ENABLING PROVISIONS OF LAWS OF KENYA AND IN THE MATTER OF: THE TAITA TAVETA COUNTY ALCOHOLIC DRINKS CONTROL AND LICENSING ACT, 2016ANDIN THE MATTER OF: SECTIONS 8 AND 9 OF THE LAW REFORM ACT, CAP 26 LAWS OF KENYA AND IN THE MATTER OF: ARTICLES 47 AND 50 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA
Between
Republic
Applicant
and
County Government of Taita Taveta
Respondent
and
Juma Barsley Mwashimba t/a JV Hotel Mwatate
Exparte Applicant
Ruling
1. Before me is a Judicial Review application by way of Notice of Motion dated 9th April 2024 filed through counsel Mutinda & Wambura Nthiga.
2. The application was filed under Order 53 Rule 3 and 4 of the Civil Procedure Rules 2010, as well as Sections 8, 9, 10 and 11 of the Fair Administrative Actions Act, after leave was granted by this court, and seeks the following orders:-1. That the court be pleased to issue an order of certiorari to remove to this court and quash and declare as null and void, the decision of the respondent communicated on 12th March 2024 on the closure of the applicants business premise popularly known as JV Hotel Mwatate and the refusal to issue licences.2. That the court be pleased to issue an order of Mandamus compelling the respondents to immediately open the applicant’s business premise popularly known as JV HotelMwatate and issue the relevant licences forthwith.3. That the court be pleased to issue an order of prohibition to bar and/or restrain the respondents from harassing, frustrating and/or closing down the applicant’s business premise popularly known as JV HOTEL, Mwatate.4. That the court be pleased to grant such or further orders it deems fit to grant in the interests of justice.5. That the costs of the application be awarded to the ex-parte applicant herein.
3. The application has grounds on the face of the Notice of Motion, and as required in Judicial Review proceedings, it is grounded on the verifying affidavit and the statement of facts filed with the Chamber Summons for leave.
4. Though the application was served on the respondent, and an affidavit of service sworn by Nicholas Lawrence Mchanji a process server on 12th April 2024 was filed, no response was filed by the respondents.
5. The application was canvassed through written submissions, and only the applicant’s counsel Mutinda & Wambura Nthiga Advocates filed submissions urging this court to grant the orders sought.
6. Having perused and considered the application and other documents filed, as well as the written submissions filed by counsel for the applicant, and in view of the fact that no response has been filed by the respondent, I find no basis for not allowing the application.
7. I thus allow the application, and order as follows:-i.This court hereby issues an order of certiorari to remove to this court and quash and declare null and void, the decision of the respondent communicated on 12th March 2024 on the closure of the applicant’s business premise popularly known an JV Hotel Mwatate and the refusal to issue licences.ii.This court hereby issues an order of mandamus compelling the respondent to immediately open the applicant’s premise popularly known as JV HotelMwatate and issue the relevant licences forthwith.iii.This court hereby issues an order of prohibition to bar and/or restrain the respondent from harassing, frustrating and/or closing down the applicant’s business premise popularly known as JV HOTEL Mwatate.iv.The ex-parte applicant is awarded the costs of these proceedings which costs are payable by the respondent.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED THIS 5TH DAY OF JUNE 2024 AT VOI IN OPEN COURT VIRTUALLY.GEORGE DULUJUDGEIn the presence of:-Alfred/Trizah – Court AssistantsMs. Wambura for applicant