[2019] KEHC 3353 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 3353 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant's application for an order of mandamus was technically unopposed, as the respondents did not file any affidavit to challenge the existence of the decree or the applicant's entitlement to payment. The only opposition was on technical grounds, which the court found unpersuasive. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 3353 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Mwamba Valuers Ltd; Respondent: County Government of Trans Nzoia; Respondent: Trans Nzoia County Executive Committee Member of Finance; Respondent: Hon. Attorney General
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kitale
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review Application 2 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Application for Order of Mandamus
Outcome
application allowed
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Mandamus Orders, Public Body Liability
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Civil Procedure Judicial Review Mandamus Orders Public Body Liability

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mwamba Valuers Ltd

Applicant

County Government of Trans Nzoia

Respondent

Trans Nzoia County Executive Committee Member of Finance

Respondent

Hon. Attorney General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Application for Order of Mandamus

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to an order of mandamus to compel the respondents to satisfy the decree in Kitale CMCCC No. 217 of 2017.
  2. 2 Whether the application is defective or an abuse of the court process.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant's application for an order of mandamus was technically unopposed, as the respondents did not file any affidavit to challenge the existence of the decree or the applicant's entitlement to payment. The only opposition was on technical grounds, which the court found unpersuasive. The court held that where a decree exists against a public body and is not satisfied, and there is no substantive opposition to the application, an order of mandamus is warranted to compel satisfaction of the decree. The application was therefore allowed with costs to the applicant.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • An order of mandamus is issued compelling the respondents to satisfy the decree in Kitale CMCCC No. 217 of 2017 amounting to Kshs. 5,114,065.
  • The respondents shall pay the costs of this application to the applicant.